MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320928758 · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101343

Nested hydrological modeling for flood prediction using CMIP6 inputs around Lake Tana, Ethiopia

2023· article· en· W4320928758 on OpenAlexaff
Addis A. Alaminie, Giriraj Amarnath, Suman Kumar Padhee, Surajit Ghosh, Seifu A. Tilahun, Muluneh Admass Mekonnen, Getachew Assefa, Abdulkarim Seid, Fasikaw A. Zimale, Mark R. Jury

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrology Regional Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythSurface runoffStructural basinEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationHydrological modellingDrainage basinCoupled model intercomparison projectHydrology (agriculture)Flood forecastingClimatologyMeteorologyClimate modelGeologyClimate changeGeographyCartographyGeomorphologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tana basin is the origin of the Blue Nile Basin located in Ethiopia. The Lake Tana’s mean annual precipitation is approximately 1400 mm/yr and its outflow drains an area of about 15,096 km2. There is limited effort to apply nested hydrological models for flood prediction due to being poorly gauged for validation. The objective of this study is to show how climate simulations can be used to generate reliable local predictions of flood and runoff for the Blue Nile in the Ethiopian highlands. In this study, outputs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) were used to initialize a nested hydrological model to reveal long-term trends of runoff in flood-prone areas of the Lake Tana basin, Ethiopia. Available satellite and reanalysis datasets were used for selection of CMIP6 products and the five models with best validation were used to force a nested hydrological model: Known as Wflow_sbm. A model-independent multi-algorithm optimization estimation tool was implemented for calibration of Wflow with insitu observations. In terms of simulating runoff and flood events, application of Wflow_sbm to the Lake Tana basin gave promising results. This study serves as a major step towards the development and implementation of global model-driven nested hydrological assessments of flood risk in future projections for Lake Tana basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrology Regional StudiesSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207