MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence of Glaucoma-Related Adverse Events in the First 5 Years After Pediatric Lensectomy

2023· article· en· W4321004058 on OpenAlex
Erick D. Bothun, Michael X. Repka, Raymond T. Kraker, Rui Wu, David A. Leske, Sarah R. Hatt, Zhuokai Li, Sharon F. Freedman, William F. Astle, Susan A. Cotter, Jonathan M. Holmes, David K. Wallace, Laura B. Enyedi, S. Grace Prakalapakorn, Sarah K. Jones, Denise Hug, Erin D. Stahl, Rebecca J. Dent, Lingkun Kong, Serena Wang, Bryan K. Gallerson, Amy K. Hutchinson, Phoebe D. Lenhart, Judy Brower, David G. Morrison, Scott T. Ruark, Rebecca Mets-Halgrimson, Hawke Yoon, Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo, Aaliyah Hamidullah, Raymond G. Areaux, Jill S. Anderson, Ann M. Holleschau, Rosanne Superstein, Caroline Bélanger, Nicole Fallaha, Patrick Hamel, Maryse Thibeault, Susanna M. Tamkins, Ta Chen Chang, Hee-Jung S. Park, Anya A. Trumler, Xiaonong Liu, Emi Sanders, Elias I. Traboulsi, Fatema F. Ghasia, Diana C. McOwen, Michael E. Gray, Michael B. Yang, Corey S. Bowman, Jennifer Galvin, Margaret Therriault, Heather Smith, Michele E. Whitaker, Faruk Örge, A. Paula Grigorian, Alicia M. Baird, Mitchell B. Strominger, Vicki Chen, Shelley Klein, Jacquelyn D. Kemmer, Alexandra E. Neiman, Myra N. Mendoza, Jill J. Frohwein, Don L. Bremer, Cybil Cassady, Richard P. Golden, Catherine O. Jordan, David L. Rogers, Sara A. Oravec, Tammy L. Yanovitch, Keven Lunsford, Christina Nye, Caroline Shea, SueAnn M. Stillman, Gaétan Laroche, Stephen C. Van Iderstine, Elisa Robertson, Oscar A. Cruz, Rafif Ghadban, Dawn Govreau, Scott A. Larson, Susannah Q. Longmuir, Xiaoyan Shan, Michael W. Clarke, Kate Taylor, Christine Powell, Benjamin P. Hammond, Matthew D. Gearinger, Andrea Czubinski, Dorothy Hendricks, Jing Jin, Jonathan Salvin, Alicia Fisher, Katherine A. Lee, Daniel Brooks, Bonita R. Schweinler, Nicholas A. Sala, Allyson M. Sala, Allison I. Summers, Daniel J. Karr, Lorri B. Wilson, Paula K. Rauch, Mary O’Hara, Nandini Gandhi, Tania Hashmi, Jeffrey Colburn, Eileen Dittman, Charles R. Whitfill, Amy M. Wheeler, Emily A. McCourt, Jasleen Singh, Nanastasia Welnick, Nathalie F. Azar, Joseph Baker, Patrick J. Droste, Robert J. Peters, Jan Hilbrands, Stacy L. Pineles, Marianne J. Bernardo, Edward Peterson, Charla H. Peterson, Kartik Kumar, Ephrem Melese, Robert W. Lingua, Jeff Grijalva, Earl R. Crouch, Gaylord Ventura, William Anninger, Shawn L. Benson, Karen A. Karp, Jordana M. Smith, Jill Brickman-Kelleher, Benjamin H. Ticho, Alexander J. Khammar, Deborah A. Clausius, Suquin Guo, Donny W. Suh, Carolyn Chamberlain, Susan Schloff, William P. Madigan, Donna Burkman, Stephen P. Christiansen, Jean E. Ramsey, Kate H. McConnell, Ilana Friedman, José Rosado, Donald P. Sauberan, Jody C. Hemberger, Patricia L. Davis, Indre Rudaitis, Robert S. Lowery, Shawn Cupit, Brian G. Mohney, Suzanne M. Wernimont, Rebecca A. Neilsen, Erin P. Herlihy, Francine Baran, Amy Gladstone, Justin Smith, Mei Mellott, Troy Kieser, S. Ayse Erzurum, Beth Colon, Birva Shah, Micaela Quebbemann, Roy W. Beck, Darrell S. Austin, Nicole M. Boyle, Courtney L. Conner, Danielle L. Chandler, Quayleen Donahue, Brooke P. Fimbel, Julianne L. Robinson, Amra Hercinovic, James E. Hoepner, Joseph D. Kaplon, Robert J. Henderson, Michele Melia, Gillaine Ortiz, Victoria C. Woodard, Kathleen M. Stutz, Desirae R. Sutherland, Donald F. Everett, Marie Diener‐West, John D. Baker, Barry R. Davis, Dale L. Phelps, Stephen W. Poff, Richard Saunders, Lawrence Tychsen, Yasmin S. Bradfield, Nicole C. Foster, David A. Plager, Daniel J. Salchow, Eileen E. Birch, Ruth E. Manny, Jayne L. Silver, Katherine K. Weise, Lisa C. Verderber, Trevano W. Dean, Kimberly G. Yen, Alejandra G. de Alba Campomanes, Marielle P. Young, Bahram Rahmani, Kathryn M. Haider, George F. Whitehead, Scott R. Lambert, Sudhi P. Kurup, Courtney L. Kraus

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Ophthalmology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAphakiaGlaucomaIncidence (geometry)PseudophakiaAdverse effectCumulative incidenceOphthalmologyCohortOcular hypertensionCohort studyCataract surgeryIntraocular lensInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Glaucoma can develop following cataract removal in children. Objective: To assess the cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events (defined as glaucoma or glaucoma suspect) and factors associated with risk of these adverse events in the first 5 years after lensectomy prior to 13 years of age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used longitudinal registry data collected at enrollment and annually for 5 years from 45 institutional and 16 community sites. Participants were children aged 12 years or younger with at least 1 office visit after lensectomy from June 2012 to July 2015. Data were analyzed from February through December 2022. Exposures: Usual clinical care after lensectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events and baseline factors associated with risk of these adverse events. Results: The study included 810 children (1049 eyes); 443 eyes of 321 children (55% female; mean [SD] age, 0.89 [1.97] years) were aphakic after lensectomy, and 606 eyes of 489 children (53% male; mean [SD] age, 5.65 [3.32] years) were pseudophakic. The 5-year cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events was 29% (95% CI, 25%-34%) in 443 eyes with aphakia and 7% (95% CI, 5%-9%) in 606 eyes with pseudophakia; 7% (95% CI, 5%-10%) of aphakic eyes and 3% (95% CI, 2%-5%) of pseudophakic eyes were diagnosed as glaucoma suspect. Among aphakic eyes, a higher risk for glaucoma-related adverse events was associated with 4 of 8 factors, including age less than 3 months (vs ≥3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.88; 99% CI, 1.57-5.23), abnormal anterior segment (vs normal: aHR, 2.88; 99% CI, 1.56-5.30), intraoperative complications at time of lensectomy (vs none; aHR, 2.25; 99% CI, 1.04-4.87), and bilaterality (vs unilaterality: aHR, 1.88; 99% CI, 1.02-3.48). Neither of the 2 factors evaluated for pseudophakic eyes, laterality and anterior vitrectomy, were associated with risk of glaucoma-related adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, glaucoma-related adverse events were common after cataract surgery in children; age less than 3 months at surgery was associated with elevated risk of the adverse events in aphakic eyes. Children with pseudophakia, who were older at surgery, less frequently developed a glaucoma-related adverse event within 5 years of lensectomy. The findings suggest that ongoing monitoring for the development of glaucoma is needed after lensectomy at any age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it