Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ferrar-style dolerites are found throughout the Transantarctic Mountains, running some 4,000 km across Antarctica; extending to Tasmania and South Africa to the Karoo system. An unusual characteristic of the Ferrar system is the extreme paucity of dike swarms that might well be expected in rifting systems. Major dike swarms are found in Canada and somewhat in the Eastern North American Rift System, but not so in Antarctica. The concentrated center of magmatic activity exhibited in the Dry Valleys is similar to what is found along ocean ridges, which is characterized by a series of spatially distributed major magmatic centers with underlying magmatic mush columns. Magma is produced and moves upward through the mush column and is distributed laterally, up and down the ridge by high level flow. The Ferrar may also be like this, as indeed most magmatic systems are, and then, where are the other such centers along the Transantarctic Mountains? The Dufek complex is clearly once such center and others may exist at various places along this range; there is telltale evidence at many locations. And it is remarkable that, by and large, there are always four major sills at most locations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".