MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321065978 · doi:10.5376/lgg.2022.13.0002

Cloning and Expression Analysis of <i>GmSAP3</i> Gene in Soybean

2022· article· en· W4321065978 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinyu Zhang, Shaolong Zhu, Maoni Chao, Xinjuan Xu, Pingxi Wang, Zhongwen Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueLegume Genomics and Genetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloning (programming)GeneIsoelectric pointBiologyGene expressionZinc fingerFunction (biology)Molecular biologyGeneticsBiochemistryTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stress is an important factor that affecting plant growth and crop yield. Stress Associated Protein (SAP), a type of zinc finger protein, is widely involved in plant development and stress response. In order to explore the function of SAP gene in soybean, we cloned the GmSAP3 gene in Shangdou 1201 and carried out bioinformatics analysis, then the expression pattern of GmSAP3 in soybean tissues and temperature stress was analyzed by real-time PCR. The results showed that the CDS of GmSAP3 was 513 bp and encoded 170 amino acids. The isoelectric point (pI) of GmSAP3 was 6.79 and its molecular weight was 18.30568 kD. GmSAP3 contained two conserved domains (zf-A20 and ZnF- AN1), and evolution analysis showed that GmSAP3 is closely related to GmSAP26. RT-PCR results showed that GmSAP3 mainly expressed in roots and leaves, and GmSAP3 is induced by high temperature stress. It is speculated that GmSAP3 play an important role in soybean stress response. This study may provide theoretical foundation for further research on the function of GmSAP3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegume Genomics and GeneticsSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207