MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The use of testosterone replacement therapy for the treatment of adult males with type 2 diabetes and hypogonadism: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2023· preprint· en· W4321084557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hanieh Norooziseyedhosseini, Roya Imani, Bushra Sumra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlycemicTestosterone (patch)Internal medicineType 2 diabetesPlaceboDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyMeta-analysisInsulin resistanceHomeostatic model assessmentRandomized controlled trialObservational study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite varying findings, TST has been used for a long time to treat hypogonadal males with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The function of TST was evaluated in this meta-analysis in hypogonadal males with type 2 diabetes. Relevant randomised controlled trials and observational studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The effects of TST were evaluated using pooled mean differences (MDs) and relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Our meta-analysis includes 3,002 hypogonadal, type 2 diabetics from 13 randomised controlled trials and 2 observational studies. Total testosterone levels increase significantly with testosterone replacement, and TST significantly improves glycemic management compared to placebo by lowering homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (WMD = -1.47 [-3.14, 0.19]; p=0.08; I2=56.3%), fasting glucose (WMD = -0.30 [-0.75, 0.15]; p=0.19; I2= 84.4%), fasting insulin (WMD = -2.95 [-8. Overall, TST resulted in a greater increase in free testosterone levels compared to placebo (WMD = 81.21 [23.87, 138.54] p=0.07; I2= 70%) when comparing patients' individual measurements.We conclude that TST can help hypogonadal Type 2 Diabetes patients with better glycemic control and hormone levels, as well as lower total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL cholesterol while raising HDL cholesterol. Therefore, in addition to the usual care for diabetes, we advise TST for these individuals.Introduction:An abnormality in one or more of the testicular hormone concentrations along the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis is the cause of the clinical syndrome known as hypogonadism. In men, hypogonadism is diagnosed when low levels of testosterone (both total and free) are found in the blood. [1] The annual incidence rate of hypogonadism is 12.3 per 1000 people, affecting between 5.1% and 12.3% of men between the ages of 30 and 79. When free testosterone levels fall below 225 pmol/l (65 pg/ml), a pathology is present and treatment is necessary. [2] Due to the devastating effects it can have on a patient's ability to perform basic bodily functions and their overall quality of life, hypogonadism is a global health problem. Recent studies have found strong evidence connecting hypogonadism and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is because low T levels cause an increase in fat storage, insulin resistance, and poor glycemic control, and a higher risk of obesity increases the likelihood of TD. [3] The use of testosterone in routine clinical care for type 2 diabetes is being questioned by a growing (and sometimes conflicting) body of research. Numerous studies have shown that testosterone treatment lowers the risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in men with type 2 diabetes, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lipid profiles, insulin sensitivity, inflammation, and levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). It has also been suggested that men with hypogonadism who undergo long-term testosterone therapy have a lower chance of developing type 2 diabetes and a higher quality of life, as measured by the Aging Male Symptoms (AMS) questionnaire. [5] There were, however, studies that found the opposite. Hypogonadal patients with type 2 diabetes have been shown in multiple studies to benefit greatly from testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), as measured by decreases in fasting serum glucose (FSG), fasting serum insulin (FSI), and haemoglobin A1C (HBA1C). [6] These indicators did not significantly decrease in TRT groups, according to other data. Total cholesterol, triglyceride, and serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels have all been shown to be reduced in studies where TRT was used, while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels were found to be increased. [7,8] But no other studies found evidence of a statistically significant improvement in lipid metabolism.Only a small number of randomised control trials and observational studies have looked at the role of TRT in male hypogonadism caused by TDM, and the results have been inconsistent. To better understand the role of TRT in hypogonadal males with type 2 diabetes, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. As far as we can tell, this meta-analysis provides the most recent look at how testosterone therapy stacks up against no treatment or placebo.Methods and MaterialsThis meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). [9]Search strategyMethods From the study's inception on September 5, 2022, to the present day, PubMed (Medline) and Cochrane were combed extensively. Searches on ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Medrxiv uncovered the grey literature and preprints. An indexing strategy was developed using both keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MESH terms). ['Testosterone' OR 'TST' OR Testosterone undecanoate] were among these. AND [[Diabetes Mellitus OR [Hypogonadism]]. Table S1 provides details on the search parameters and parameters. In conducting this search, we did not apply any filters or limitations. In the case of non-English text, Google Translate was used to produce an English version. The studies were located through manual searches of review articles. Two reviewers independently and anonymously evaluated the titles, abstracts, and full texts (MK and SK). The relevant studies were imported into Endnote X9 to avoid repetition (Clarivate Analytics, US).Criteria for EligibilityCriteria for inclusionThe studies were chosen based on their language, study design, patient population, intervention, comparison, outcomes of interest, and definition.Publications were limited to those written in English, and studies had to be either randomised clinical trials or observational studies that met certain criteria for inclusion before the meta-analysis could be performed.Hypogonadism patients are those who have type 2 diabetes and have been diagnosed with the condition.Patients who participated in the study's exposure group included those who had received testosterone therapy.The non-TST group served as a control and received either the gold standard of care or a placebo in this analysis.Implications on glucose homeostasis and hormonal levels after treatment constitute the Primary Outcomes.Measurements of cholesterol, body mass index, waist size, fat percentage, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were recorded as secondary outcomes.Criteria for exclusionThe following significant exclusion criteria were established to ensure the quality of this meta-analysis:• There are no agreed-upon criteria for making a diagnosis of late-onset hypogonadism or type 2 diabetes, determining the appropriate population to study, dosage, or administration method for testosterone, or evaluating outcomes.There are no control or placebo groups• Duplicate publications • Inadequate data for estimating a mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence intervalIn addition, the 25-item CONSORT checklists, which stress describing how trials were conceived, analysed, and interpreted, were used to assess all included RCTs (Table S2). The 25 reported items were used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. The strength of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) correlates with the number of outcomes that were reported. All 25 criteria should be present in high-quality research.Data ExtractionData ExtractionTwo researchers (HN and RI) independently read and evaluated each article to determine whether or not it should be included in the review. Questions were answered and doubts dispelled. We collected the following data from each trial: first author's name, publication year, country, ethnicity, testosterone cut-off point, diabetes duration, testosterone regimen, medications on comparators, mean age, Hba1c percentage, and total serum testosterone level. Table 1 summarises these facts. Parameters such as HOMA-IR, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, haemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, body fat percentage, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, erectile function, and the ageing male score are listed in Table 2.Study quality assessmentPublished RCT quality was evaluated using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool [10], while observational study quality was measured using the New Castle Ottawa scale. [11] Statistical analysis The aforementioned meta-analysis was conducted using the statistics software Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration). For a simple yes/no outcome, we found the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI. The average and standard deviation were used to illustrate continuous results. In this meta-analysis, we show the combined effect of relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) calculated with the generic-inverse variance and continuous outcome functions using a random-effects model. Results were considered to be statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05. In order to assess the possibility of publication bias, funnel plots were constructed for primary outcomes.Using I2 statistics, we were able to quantify the degree of disagreement between studies. Low heterogeneity was represented by an I2 value of 25%, moderate heterogeneity by a value between 25% and 50%, and high heterogeneity by a value of 50% or more. A sensitivity analysis on outcomes with a high degree of heterogeneity was performed to investigate the impact of individual studies on the overall pooled estimate.ResultsStudy selectionThe initial literature search yielded a total of 659 articles. Out of the initial 30 publications, only 15 met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis; 2 were observational [12,24] and 13 were randomised trials [5,8,13-23]. The distinguishing characteristics of the selected studies are outlined in (Supplementary table S2 and S3)Baseline characteristics Three thousand and two people met the criteria for hypogonadism across the 15 studies; 1484 received testosterone and 1518 received a placebo. Six studies [8,12,14,18,20,24] required the presence of at least three sexual symptoms and a total testosterone level of 12 nmol/L to diagnose hypogonadism, while the remaining studies [5,13,15,16,17,19,21,22] required the presence of a total testosterone level of 15 nmol/L or a free testosterone level of 225 pmol/L to make the diagnosis. The cutoff for hypogonadism in another study [13] was set at TT13 nmol/L. The primary testosterone regimens used in the included studies varied widely. Only one study () used oral testosterone, three (15,17,21) injected testosterone gel subcutaneously, and eleven (5,8,12-14,16,18-20,22,23,24) injected testosterone intramuscularly. Testosterone was administered in a wide variety of doses and at different intervals in these studies. Only two of the RCTs [17,19] lacked a control group entirely, while the other eleven [5,8,13-16,18,20-23] were double-blind placebo-controlled studies. Table 1 and Table 2 provide information about the participants' demographics, medical histories, hormone levels, and glycemic indices as appropriate for the study.Quality assessment and publication biasAccording to the New Castle-Ottawa scale, an instrument for assessing the quality of studies, there is a low risk of bias in observational studies (Supplementary Table 4). The Cochrane method for evaluating randomised controlled trials yielded results of moderate to high quality (Supplementary Table 5). Publication bias did not affect the findings, as demonstrated by the funnel plots (Supplementary Figure S1).Primary outcomes:The effects of testosterone on glucometabolism were assessed by measuring HOMA-IR, haemoglobin A1c, fasting serum glucose (FSG), and fasting serum insulin (FSI). Data from 9 of the 15 studies reporting on HOMA-IR ([5,8,13,14,16,17,21,22,24]) showed that testosterone therapy was superior to placebo at lowering HOMA-IR levels (WMD = -1.47 [-3.14, 0.19]; p = 0.08; I2 = 56.3%). Patients in the testosterone group showed a greater decrease in FSG after treatment compared to those in the placebo group (WMD = -0.30 [-0.75, 0.15]; p=0.19; I2= 84.4%). FSG was measured in 14 [5,8,12-19,21-24] of the 15 studies. WMD = -2.95 [-8.64,2.74]; p = 0.31; I2 = 49.3%]; 8 [8,13,15-18,22,24] of 15 studies found that patients treated with testosterone had greater reductions in FSI levels. Among the 15 studies, 13 reported HbA1c values, and pooled analysis showed that testosterone treatment was associated with a greater improvement in post-treatment HbA1c levels (WMD = -0.29 [-0.57, -0.02] p=0.04; I2= 89.8%). (Figure 3)Total testosterone, free testosterone, serum hormone binding protein (SHBG), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were taken into account to determine testosterone's impact on hormone levels. The pooled analysis of 9 studies that measured total testosterone levels [5,12,13,18,19,21-24] found that testosterone therapy is associated with a significant increase in total testosterone levels (WMD = 4.51 [2.40, 6.61] p0.0001; I2= 96.3%). The in-study heterogeneity was unaffected by excluding individual studies from the pooled analysis.Combining data from three studies [13,14,21] found that patients on testosterone therapy experienced a greater increase in free testosterone levels compared to those on placebo (WMD = 81.21 [23.87, 138.54] p=0.07; I2= 70%). After pooling data from 5 studies [13,17,21,22,23], researchers found that SHBG level decreased more with testosterone therapy (WMD = -1.28 [-5.51, 2.96] p=0.55; I2 = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference in PSA levels between the two groups after therapy (WMD = -0.02 [-0.13, 0.08] p=0.65; I2 = 0%) across seven studies [8,13,14,15,17,21,23].Secondary outcomes: (Table 3)Treatment with testosterone has been shown in a pooled analysis of secondary outcomes to improve HDL cholesterol and IIEF, as well as reduce total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, body fat, waist circumference, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, arterial mean stiffness, and mortality.Discussion:Recent studies have found that hypogonadism occurs in a high percentage of men with Type-2 diabetes. Despite growing knowledge of the correlation between T2D and hypogonadism, no universally accepted guidelines exist for dealing with the condition. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to develop clear, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of hypogonadism in men with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who are taking testosterone replacement therapy. Evidence linking type 2 diabetes and low blood testosterone due to an insulin has been established by multiple studies a significant incidence of hypogonadism in males with diabetes is more in males with diabetes than in men across the including in the and The effects of testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal males with type 2 diabetes were compared to those in a control group in a systematic review and meta-analysis 15 studies and patients (T2DM). All men with Type 2 diabetes and all men with a body mass greater than 30 or a waist greater than were for for hypogonadism by the of in The guidelines to testosterone the high of hypogonadism in type 2 diabetes. for hypogonadism was for in by the of in all men with Type 2 diabetes and in all men with a body mass of 30 or or a waist of or more. In of the high of hypogonadism in such as type 2 diabetes, the guidelines for the In men with hypogonadism, testosterone replacement therapy has been shown to have a effect on a wide of including sexual and function, body quality of life, and cardiovascular the for testosterone are up for effects of testosterone replacement therapy have been by the guidelines into two those with a strong to testosterone such as and an increase in decreased and the of and those with a such as and the of results the of studies [5,8,12-19,21-24] that TRT can significantly glucose control by for fasting serum glucose (FSG), fasting insulin (FSI), and glycated haemoglobin (HBA1C). Recent has established a correlation between HOMA-IR and body mass index, waist circumference, and sensitivity, as measured by in HOMA-IR, and blood and levels, was also by testosterone the presence of Testosterone replacement therapy for hypogonadal males with diabetes has been to in both body mass and glucose The testosterone treatment group showed statistically significant in body mass index, fasting glucose, blood pressure, lipid profiles, and according to a of testosterone treatment to concentrations for decreased insulin resistance HOMA-IR p = had no effect on body or waist in a testosterone trial men the of were and had diabetes at Testosterone therapy has been to long-term a decrease in risk and in the of diabetes, according to a number of case studies. with testosterone was for a with erectile and at intervals following a Patients on testosterone therapy in fasting blood glucose after to below after 12 and below this insulin resistance at and serum lipid levels and To understand the between and glucose more studies are meta-analysis, we looked at a lipid of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein low-density lipoprotein and levels. studies found that testosterone had lower total cholesterol levels compared to placebo the other 14 studies showed that while HDL cholesterol levels there was less of a difference in LDL cholesterol levels between the two meta-analysis found that TRT significantly total cholesterol compared to placebo. There was also a in triglycerides, it was not statistically HDL levels after TRT compared to the placebo role in HDL was due to a of evidence and results. It has been shown that high doses of TRT lower levels of HDL and lipoprotein effect on blood lipid and lipoprotein levels is The 14 studies that up meta-analysis all showed a in diastolic blood pressure and a in systolic blood pressure The effects of testosterone on lipid in the blood are In men with and type 2 diabetes, low testosterone has been to levels of LDL and and decreased In patients with high testosterone profiles, studies found no between serum lipid levels or TRT has been shown to significantly reduce and total cholesterol in men with and hypogonadism in systematic and of the patient's waist and body mass can be used for for Testosterone is as an due to ability to decrease and increase mass in males with hypogonadism. studies, which the aforementioned randomised controlled have found that testosterone therapy results in a greater in body mass significant correlation between total serum testosterone and and was found in three studies. with testosterone significantly reduced while in sexual as measured by the scale, the erectile and the scale, have been associated with low testosterone in men nmol/L function, and not significantly however, according to the the was the only of data on we can that the improvement in quality of was to a in sexual levels of testosterone were including and total and free testosterone levels while SHBG PSA levels were not to this therapy. The impact of TRT on PSA has been the of multiple Despite the primary of the was not on PSA and testosterone on TRT and the risk of prostate factors for cardiovascular disease such as and diabetes are with have a effect on and the level has been suggested as a of in a number of studies. to the conducted by TRT significantly PSA levels compared to placebo. can be from meta-analysis. we two more studies to meta-analysis, have about as of a to A sensitivity analysis was to determine the impact of studies on the plots and such as the funnel and were used to evaluate of publication and all of that the were not statistically meta-analysis also included an observational study, and we it for publication bias using the New Castle-Ottawa We total testosterone, free testosterone, and PSA to account for information in the literature that is in individual we did a of it is to the of studies had different with of the of homeostasis in the studies are when evaluating hormonal hypogonadism. Testosterone was used in a wide variety of doses and administration across a number of studies This clinical heterogeneity be to differences in study and patient factors body mass index, age, size, ethnicity, and trial There have been randomised controlled trials the between body fat, and free testosterone, and All included RCTs of reporting bias, for was to how testosterone therapy most studies did not information on doses for control groups, which have results that hypogonadal patients who long-term testosterone replacement therapy experienced a of their diabetes. This therapy glycemic control, decreased total cholesterol, HDL levels, and triglycerides, and reduced body mass and waist We that this treatment be taken in with medications for these The long-term and cardiovascular effects to be Testosterone in An diabetes mellitus syndrome and diabetes Testosterone therapy for and of type 2 diabetes in men with low with to testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism and type 2 diabetes Testosterone treatment than 1 more effects on hypogonadism and and obesity parameters of the clinical Aging of testosterone treatment in hypogonadal males with a meta-analysis and systematic review. of testosterone treatment on and sexual symptoms in men with type 2 diabetes in a placebo-controlled clinical of testosterone treatment on glucose in men with type 2 a controlled Diabetes The for reporting systematic and of studies that evaluate and Cochrane Cochrane Statistical The Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised The for the of in Testosterone in From to Type 2 Data From a Diabetes and in and After Testosterone in Type 2 Diabetes Testosterone replacement therapy improves parameters in hypogonadal men with type 2 diabetes not in men with the Testosterone replacement in hypogonadal men with type 2 diabetes syndrome Diabetes of hypogonadism with testosterone in patients with type 2 diabetes treatment with and testosterone the syndrome and improves glycemic control in men with diagnosed type 2 diabetes and plasma Testosterone replacement therapy improves insulin resistance, control, and in hypogonadal men with type 2 diabetes. Testosterone in men with type 2 diabetes, obesity and Aging testosterone therapy in type 2 diabetes is associated with reduced improvement in cardiovascular risk of testosterone on glycemic control and in men with diagnosed hypogonadism and type 2 diabetes a controlled Aging The impact of testosterone replacement therapy on glycemic control, function, and of the syndrome in hypogonadal men with type 2 diabetes. Aging Testosterone treatment to or type 2 diabetes in men in a a Diabetes of type 2 diabetes following long-term treatment with testosterone in patients with hypogonadism and type 2 data from a Diabetes and of low testosterone levels in men with type 2 diabetes a study in a in of Testosterone in with Type 2 Diabetes and The and risks of testosterone replacement a review. of testosterone replacement therapy on insulin sensitivity and body in A of type 2 diabetes and effects of long-term testosterone treatment for A case of testosterone replacement therapy for in late-onset a systematic review and meta-analysis. The of on of the of Testosterone in Low A From the of between antigen and serum A systematic review and meta-analysis. to on HOMA-IR model assessment for insulin FSG serum FSI serum weighted mean confidence on = hormone binding PSA specific

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.056
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHormonal and reproductive studies→French-language works237,207→