MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321096130 · doi:10.1080/24745332.2022.2150722

Post-exertional malaise in pulmonary rehabilitation after COVID-19: Are we not giving enough attention?

2023· article· en· W4321096130 on OpenAlex
Nourhan Kotb, Laura Barreto, Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalaiseExertional dyspneaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineRehabilitationContext (archaeology)Psychological interventionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Physical therapyIntensive care medicinePsychiatryInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post COVID-19 condition is defined as the illness that occurs in people who have a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; usually within three months from the onset of COVID-19, with symptoms and effects that last for at least two months. The most common symptoms of people with post-COVID condition are symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, brain fog and post-exertional malaise (PEM). International guidelines on the management of COVID-19 highlight the importance of screening patients for PEM before rehabilitation interventions and carefully monitoring symptoms in response to physical activity to avoid flare-ups. We sought to determine how PEM is being considered in the context of rehabilitation for COVID-19 by reviewing the published literature and registries of clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it