MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321096130 · doi:10.1080/24745332.2022.2150722

Post-exertional malaise in pulmonary rehabilitation after COVID-19: Are we not giving enough attention?

2023· article· en· W4321096130 on OpenAlexaff
Nourhan Kotb, Laura Barreto, Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalaiseExertional dyspneaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineRehabilitationContext (archaeology)Psychological interventionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Physical therapyIntensive care medicinePsychiatryInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post COVID-19 condition is defined as the illness that occurs in people who have a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; usually within three months from the onset of COVID-19, with symptoms and effects that last for at least two months. The most common symptoms of people with post-COVID condition are symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, brain fog and post-exertional malaise (PEM). International guidelines on the management of COVID-19 highlight the importance of screening patients for PEM before rehabilitation interventions and carefully monitoring symptoms in response to physical activity to avoid flare-ups. We sought to determine how PEM is being considered in the context of rehabilitation for COVID-19 by reviewing the published literature and registries of clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep MedicineSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207