MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321100072 · doi:10.1111/pech.12590

TedOsius. Nothing Is Impossible: America's Reconciliation with Vietnam. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2022.

2023· article· en· W4321100072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenton Clymer

Bibliographic record

VenuePeace &amp Change · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingCitationLibrary scienceHistoryMedia studiesComputer scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ted Osius' "most consequential accomplishment" (165) as United States ambassador to Vietnam from 2014 to 2017 was arranging the visit of the General Secretary of Vietnam's Communist Party, Nguyên Phú Trong, with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office in July 2015.Arranging the visit had not been easy.Trong was suspicious of the United States, suspecting that the Americans wanted regime change.Furthermore, Oval Office visits were for heads of state, not party leaders.National Security Adviser Susan Rice opposed the visit.But Secretary of State John Kerry was able to override Rice's objections."I got beat up for making the case," Kerry later said (150).Why was Trong's visit so consequential?Because nothing was more important to Ambassador Osius than reconciling with Vietnam.Vietnam's hoped-for entry into the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), then being negotiated, would be a major step in that reconciliation.To enter the TPP, Vietnam would have to make human rights concessions, most notably agreeing to "free assembly for Vietnamese workers" (151).Furthermore, Vietnam's security connections with the Americans had increased as China became increasingly assertive.Only Trong could ensure that the growing US-Vietnam partnership would last.The meeting was a great success.Scheduled for 45 minutes, it lasted 90 minutes.Obama and Trong made significant commitments."Trong's commitment on workers' rights was the biggest human rights concession Vietnam had ever made" (165), writes Osius in this memoir and history of work to reconcile the two former wartime enemies.Osius joined the Foreign Service in 1989, and, after diplomatic relations were restored in 1995 during the Bill Clinton administration, at his request he was posted to Vietnam in 1996 as a political officer.He learned Vietnamese, which he practiced with bar girls who were "happy to be paid for doing nothing more than talking" (21).The American embassy pursued reconciliation.The United States hoped to upgrade cooperation on locating the remains of American soldiers.Vietnamese officials, too, were eager to increase cooperation, among them the incomparable Nguyên Có Thąch.(Thąch, Vietnam's foreign minister in the 1980s, had only recently emerged from five years of house arrest, imposed, writes Osius, due to pressure from China, which considered him too pro-American.)Osius also championed close contacts with ordinary Vietnamese.Among his early initiatives in 1997 was the first in what became a string of long-distance bicycle rides, allowing him to converse directly with ordinary people and learn their concerns.Later, as ambassador, he continued those rides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.012
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeace &amp Change→Same topicVietnamese History and Culture Studies→French-language works237,207→