Some Issues of Research and Intercultural Communication Curriculum Development at Sai Gon University in the Integration Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the opening and integration of our country, we have attracted many investors from various fields all around the world such as economy, society and so on, leading to the development of many changes in life, language and culture in Vietnamese communication. So "some issues of research and intercultural communication development curriculum at Sai Gon University in the integration period” is a topic that has important value in communication and this topic is worthy to be paid attention for carrying out a research. However, due to the limitation of the article, we only discuss the issues of research and develop an intercultural communication curriculum in the training of the Master's program in Linguistics at Sai Gon University, Viet Nam. To accomplish this topic, a mix of methods will be employed, including surveying, listing and describing to clarify the issues of communication and intercultural communication in the conditions of the current country. Since then, we offer applications in teaching activities and curriculum development on issues that are closely related to communication, intercultural communication and linguistic in the development and integration period in Viet Nam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".