Interpretation for Variational Autoencoder Used to Generate Financial Synthetic Tabular Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthetic data, artificially generated by computer programs, has become more widely used in the financial domain to mitigate privacy concerns. Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is one of the most popular deep-learning models for generating synthetic data. However, VAE is often considered a “black box” due to its opaqueness. Although some studies have been conducted to provide explanatory insights into VAE, research focusing on explaining how the input data could influence VAE to create synthetic data, especially for tabular data, is still lacking. However, in the financial industry, most data are stored in a tabular format. This paper proposes a sensitivity-based method to assess the impact of inputted tabular data on how VAE synthesizes data. This sensitivity-based method can provide both global and local interpretations efficiently and intuitively. To test this method, a simulated dataset and three Kaggle banking tabular datasets were employed. The results confirmed the applicability of this proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it