MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321105135 · doi:10.3390/a16020121

Interpretation for Variational Autoencoder Used to Generate Financial Synthetic Tabular Data

2023· article· en· W4321105135 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinhong Wu, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis, Lucy Liu, Ehsan Amjadian, Yuri Lawryshyn

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgorithms · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooRoyal Bank of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAutoencoderComputer scienceSynthetic dataDomain (mathematical analysis)Interpretation (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceBlack boxSensitivity (control systems)Data miningDeep learningMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic data, artificially generated by computer programs, has become more widely used in the financial domain to mitigate privacy concerns. Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is one of the most popular deep-learning models for generating synthetic data. However, VAE is often considered a “black box” due to its opaqueness. Although some studies have been conducted to provide explanatory insights into VAE, research focusing on explaining how the input data could influence VAE to create synthetic data, especially for tabular data, is still lacking. However, in the financial industry, most data are stored in a tabular format. This paper proposes a sensitivity-based method to assess the impact of inputted tabular data on how VAE synthesizes data. This sensitivity-based method can provide both global and local interpretations efficiently and intuitively. To test this method, a simulated dataset and three Kaggle banking tabular datasets were employed. The results confirmed the applicability of this proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlgorithmsSame topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFrench-language works237,207