MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321115874 · doi:10.1016/j.ngib.2023.01.001

Coal bed methane gas in-place estimation for the North-Western region of Zimbabwe

2023· article· en· W4321115874 on OpenAlex
Bruce Mutume, Doruk Alp

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Gas Industry B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalMethaneNatural gasRange (aeronautics)Probabilistic logicProbability distributionProbability density functionEnvironmental scienceStatisticsLiquefied natural gasMonte Carlo methodPetroleum engineeringGeologyMineralogySoil scienceMathematicsChemistryMaterials scienceEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coal Bed Methane (CBM) is natural gas occurring in coal seams. It can be used for domestic (heating and cooking) and industrial purposes, electricity generation, transportation (as compressed natural gas or liquefied natural gas), and in boilers supporting mining operations. It is established that Zimbabwe has CBM in the North-Western region. At the time of this study, only one organization (Industrial Development Corporation) has reported an Original Gas in Place (OGIP) estimate for the region as 765 Bm3. In this study we use Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to estimate the range of OGIP values for the region. MCS is a widely used probabilistic method, preferred over deterministic methods in which only best-estimate values of parameters are used to predict a single OGIP value. This single OGIP value may be either positively (overestimated) or negatively skewed (underestimated). However, the probabilistic approach using MCS accounts for the uncertainty in values of parameters. This is done by incorporating appropriate range and probability distributions (e.g. triangular, normal, uniform, etc.) of input parameters (e.g. target area, formation thickness, coal bulk density, and adsorbed methane content), and repeating calculations to generate a cumulative distribution curve for the OGIP. The generated curve provides statistical confidence levels represented as probability distributions, i.e. P10, P50, and P90 represents low, mid, and high probability estimates, respectively. Our results show that P10, P50, and P90 values for the North-Western region OGIP are 5699 Bm3, 2347 Bm3, and 706 Bm3, respectively. The Resource Density (RD) estimation is found to range from 0.015 Bm3/km2 to 0.113 Bm3/km2 over the geographic area. This range is comparable to Alberta plains shallow and deep basins in Canada which boosts a higher level of confidence for CBM potential in Zimbabwe. The results are encouraging for further exploration and planning of exploitation of CBM in Zimbabwe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it