MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321123701 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202336901008

The Influence of Greenhouse Effect on Earth’s Atmosphere Based on Artificial Intelligence

2023· article· en· W4321123701 on OpenAlexaff
Yiming Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmosphere (unit)Greenhouse gasGreenhouseEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesCarbon dioxideGreenhouse effectStratosphereMeteorologyGlobal warmingClimate changeChemistryGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greenhouse gases absorb and release a large amount of ground thermal radiation, and modify part of the energy between the earth and the atmosphere, so that it has a greenhouse effect. It is the main cause of global warming and climate anomaly caused by modern human activities. In order to solve the shortcomings of the existing research on the impact of greenhouse effect on the Earth’s atmosphere, this paper briefly introduces the numerical methods of radiation and heat conduction coupling, the components of the Earth’s atmosphere, and the sources and sinks of greenhouse gases. The calculation and analysis of spectral absorption coefficient and the configuration of super parameters of depth learning model are discussed. A numerical simulation of carbon dioxide concentration based on depth learning is constructed and the C02 concentration profile is calculated using the C02 statistical inversion flow of principal component analysis. The calculated temperatures of the standard atmosphere and the standard atmosphere with the carbon dioxide concentration doubled were compared. The data showed that the temperature in the upper stratosphere rose to 58.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207