Gereja Katolik Santo Fransiskus Assisi Padang Tahun 1966-2019
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini fokus pada faktor perkembangan Gereja Katolik Santo Fransiskus Assisi yang sudah berdiri pada tahun 1960. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hal pokok dalam pendekatan ini adalah melaluis studi dokumen, dan wawancara mendalam terhadap pelaku seperti Pastor, Pegawai Paroki dan beberapa umat gereja yang sudah lama ada di gereja ini. Agar mempertajam analisis, penelitian juga menggunakan metode penelitian sejarah. Adapun bagian-bagian dari metode penelitian sejarah ini, di antaranya heuristik, kritik sumber, interpretasi dan historiografi (penulisan). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan berkembangnya gereja disebabkan oleh berkembangnya jumlah jemaat umat Katolik di Kota Padang sejak masa Orde Baru.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it