MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321150875

A catalogue of open NASA blade models

2023· preprint· en· W4321150875 on OpenAlexaff
Solène Kojtych, Alain Batailly

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlade (archaeology)GeologyComputer scienceGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This catalogue contains computer-Aided Design (CAD) models, finite element (FE) meshes and reduced-order models (ROM) related to 39 open NASA geometries. Most of these geometries were initially defined at NASA Lewis Research Center in the context of research programs conducted in the 70’s and 80’s. Models related to these geometries have been recently computed and are made publicly available in this catalogue to facilitate the comparison of numerical strategies focusing on nonlinear structural interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207