MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321231141 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202336802016

Numerical modelling of enhancement of the capacity of buried metal culverts by using geogrids

2023· article· en· W4321231141 on OpenAlexaff
Islam Ezzeldin, Hany El Naggar, John Newhook

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCulvertGeotechnical engineeringArchServiceability (structure)GeogridStructural engineeringEngineeringNumerical analysisLateral earth pressureBending momentDeformation (meteorology)GeologyReinforcement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a two-dimensional numerical modelling analysis of a flexible buried corrugated metal arch culvert in Enkoping, Sweden. The numerical results of this study are validated against field measurements of the culvert crown deformation, thrust, and bending moments recorded during backfilling. To model the backfill soil, the hardening soil with small strains (HSs) material model is used because of its efficiency in simulating the soil-structure interaction. Furthermore, in a numerical investigation of the stress distribution at the culvert invert, it is found that weakness of the foundation soil has an insignificant impact, due to stress dissipation resulting from arching actions. The numerical modelling analysis also investigates the use of geogrid layers with dead end bolts in the soil cover above the culvert crown during the application of static surface loads, as an innovative technique to improve the load capacity of the soil-culvert system. The results show a reduction in culvert crown deformation and internal forces when geogrid layers are used. This indicates the efficiency of geogrid layers in improving the load capacity of existing buried culverts or overcoming deficiencies in culvert serviceability by reducing the impact of applied loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207