MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321235117 · doi:10.1007/s10291-023-01410-y

Assessment of Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) test signals and preliminary positioning performance

2023· article· en· W4321235117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGPS Solutions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersHorizon 2020Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGalileo (satellite navigation)Global Positioning SystemGNSS applicationsComputer scienceGeodesyPrecise Point PositioningSatelliteService (business)Convergence (economics)Remote sensingReal-time computingTelecommunicationsGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) is a GNSS augmentation that provides precise satellite corrections to users worldwide for free directly through Galileo's E6 signal. The HAS service provides free PPP corrections from the Galileo constellation and the Internet, with targeted real-time 95% positioning performance of better than 20 cm horizontal and 40 cm vertical error after 5 min of convergence time globally and shorter in Europe. The HAS initial service, under validation at the time of writing, provides these capabilities with a reduced performance (based on the current Galileo stations network). Live HAS test signals broadcasted from the Galileo satellites during summer 2022 have been decoded and analyzed. Corrections include Galileo and GPS orbit, clock, and code bias corrections, with SISRE of 10.6 cm and 11.8 cm for Galileo and GPS, respectively. Code bias corrections showed good performance as well, with rms of 0.28 ns, 0.26 ns, and 0.22 ns for Galileo C1C-C5Q, C1C-C7Q, and C1C-C6C, respectively, and 0.20 ns for GPS C1C-C2L. Float PPP positioning performance results show that the combined Galileo and GPS solution can already achieve the HAS full service accuracy performance target and is close in terms of convergence time, with 95% rms of 13.1 cm and 18.6 cm horizontally and vertically, respectively, in kinematic mode, and with a 95% convergence time of 7.5 min. The latter is expected to be improved with the inclusion of satellite phase bias and local atmospheric corrections. With these early Galileo HAS test signals, this preliminary analysis indicates that the HAS full service targets are attainable. Finally, a correction latency analysis is performed, showing that even with latency of up to 60 s, positioning can remain within the targeted HAS accuracy performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it