Coal rheology – the effect of coal origin, rank, and particle size
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coal rheology is a critical parameter for determining the coking and caking ability of metallurgical coals for cokemaking. The effect of rank, hardness differences due to rank, and particle size on the resultant fluidity and dilatation results were demonstrated for various rank Applachian coals in previous studies. Particles less than USA Standard screen size No. 140 had poorer rheology responses compared to other size fractions. For the third phase of this study, the effect of particle size and rank of Western Canadian coals were also evaluated. All samples and rheology parameters were determined prepared using the standard ASTM methods. In addition, rheology was also measured on sized subsets to determine the effect of particle size and rank on the overall rheology results but from a different geological era compared to Applachian coals. Particle size limits for the Gieseler and Dilatometer tests are suggested. The importance of using temperature range is also emphasized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it