MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321276238 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.07906

A structured jet explains the extreme GRB 221009A

2023· preprint· en· W4321276238 on OpenAlexfundno aff
B. O'Connor, E. Troja, G. Ryan, P. Beniamini, Hendrik van Eerten, Jonathan Granot, S. Dichiara, R. Ricci, V. Lipunov, J. H. Gillanders, R. Gill, M. Moss, S. Anand, I. Andreoni, R. L. Becerra, D. A. H. Buckley, N. R. Butler, S. B. Cenko, A. Chasovnikov, J. Durbak, C. Francile, E. Hammerstein, A. J. van der Horst, M. M. Kasliwal, C. Kouveliotou, A. S. Kutyrev, W. H. Lee, G. Srinivasaragavan, V. Topolev, A. M. Watson, Y. H. Yang, K. Zhirkov

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilGoddard Space Flight CenterJet Propulsion LaboratoryInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueGovernment of CanadaMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesLomonosov Moscow State UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUnited States-Israel Binational Science FoundationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionNational Science FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsAfterglowGamma-ray burstPhysicsAstrophysicsJet (fluid)COSMIC cancer databaseStarsBrightnessApproxEnergy (signal processing)Event (particle physics)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are powerful cosmic explosions, signaling the death of massive stars. Among them, GRB 221009A is by far the brightest burst ever observed. Due to its enormous energy ($E_\textrm{iso}\!\approx$10$^{55}$ erg) and proximity ($z\!\approx$0.15), GRB 221009A is an exceptionally rare event that pushes the limits of our theories. We present multi-wavelength observations covering the first three months of its afterglow evolution. The X-ray brightness decays as a power-law with slope $\approx\!t^{-1.66}$, which is not consistent with standard predictions for jetted emission. We attribute this behavior to a shallow energy profile of the relativistic jet. A similar trend is observed in other energetic GRBs, suggesting that the most extreme explosions may be powered by structured jets launched by a common central engine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.091 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207