Comportamento de lactentes em decúbito lateral e a influência da adição de peso no punho
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Several studies on the behavior of infants in different postures. However, few have investigated the lateral position, a posture that is often used in physical therapy early stimulation, and also the effects of adding weight to segments. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the behavior of the infant in lateral recumbency, with and without added weight. Materials and Methods: We studied 6 healthy infants evaluated according to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale, and then placed on a gurney for filming of the conduct in 3 phases: I (pre-weight), II (excess weight = 20% of the mass of the upper limb) and III (post-weight), lasting two minutes each. We observed the hand-mouth coordination, joins hands and scope. Stimulation was performed by means of soft toys. Results: We found that the conduct of range, joining hands and hand-mouth coordination in the lateral position were positively influenced by addition and removal of weight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".