MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321331903 · doi:10.1080/23268263.2023.2176407

Reclaiming Calliope: Freeing the Female Voice through Undomesticated Singing <b>Reclaiming Calliope: Freeing the Female Voice through Undomesticated Singing</b> , by Fides Krucker, Berkeley, CA, USA North Atlantic Books, 2022, 320 pp., US $18.35 (paperback), ISBN 9781623177065

2023· article· en· W4321331903 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shannon Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueVoice and Speech Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingingDramaImprovisationArtVisual artsDancePerforming artsLiteratureMedia studiesHistorySociologyAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considered a pioneer in contemporary vocal practices, Canadian singer, interdisciplinary artist, and educator Fides Krucker has been performing, teaching, and challenging the status quo of vocal pe...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoice and Speech ReviewSame topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207