Prolonged post-orogenic extension in the southeastern Canadian Cordillera: Miocene reactivation of the Columbia River Fault
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-orogenic extension in the southeastern Canadian Cordillera manifested in the form of metamorphic core complexes exhumed during the Paleocene–Eocene, but new thermochronology data suggest this interval may be longer. The Columbia River Fault is a brittle-ductile normal fault bounding the eastern margin of the Monashee Complex, southeastern British Columbia. Vertical motions along this fault are investigated here using apatite fission-track and (U-Th)/He thermochronology and samples from two elevation profiles. Apatite fission track ages range from 29.3 to 17.7 Ma, and apatite (U-Th)/He ages range from 26.6 to 7.0 Ma. Inverse thermal history modeling of these profiles suggests the footwall underwent rapid cooling between 18 and 16 Ma, whereas the hanging wall experienced more protracted cooling since 40 Ma, with two small cooling pulses at 20 and 10 Ma. These new data suggest the Columbia River Fault was reactivated in the early Miocene and continued to exhume the Monashee Complex an additional ∼2 km. Combining all thermochronology data from the region suggests three phases of accelerated cooling in the Monashee Complex; 1) Eocene (56–40 Ma); 2) Miocene (20–16 Ma); and 3) Pliocene to recent. Thermal history modeling of thermochronometric data reported from elevation profiles from across the wider region of the southern Canadian Cordillera find early Miocene cooling phases contemporaneous with that seen along the Columbia River Fault. This widespread exhumation coincides with early Miocene plate tectonic reorganization of the Pacific-North American margin which resulted in increased transtension in northwestern North America. We propose that the early Miocene reactivation of the Columbia River Fault is a splay fault associated with dextral strike slip faulting along the Rocky Mountain Trench , driven by an increase in transtensional stresses along the Pacific-North American plate boundary . Building on earlier models, pre-existing gravitational instabilities in the southeastern Canadian Cordillera aided in lateral extension of the upper crust along unstable inherited structures throughout the Shuswap Metamorphic Core Complex
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".