MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321354185 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.0003

Loved It: The Boys of Summer

2023· article· en· W4321354185 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karen E. Kubara

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeConversationBiographyWitnessAdventureSubject (documents)LiteratureHistoryArt historyClubDiasporaArtClassicsSociologyLawPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loved It: The Boys of Summer Karen E. Kubara (bio) Roger Kahn aspired to be a writer. When the crunch came, he promised himself to write one book, his book, about the things and places and people he loved.1 That his subject was baseball is particularly American. Writers had been inspired by organized baseball almost from its beginning. The press box at the Polo Grounds circa 1907– 11 “could easily have been mistaken for an outdoor literary club,” sportswriter Bozeman Bulger once said.2 In The Boys of Summer Kahn is fan, reporter, and literary artist. His book is a classic. I call as my first witness Brett McKay of theartofmanliness.com. After studying the classics in college, McKay will tell you why every man should study classical culture. We know Kahn grew up immersed in the classics, at school and at home, which, to the dismay of some readers, comes through in his writing. McKay, his wife Kate, and their team have compiled a list: 100 Books Every Man Should Read over his lifetime, “a library that centers on books that expand mind and soul, build new mental models, allowing you to become more culturally literate and thus better able to participate in the ‘Great Conversation.’”3 (Lord knows we could use more cultural literacy out there.) Among the works of Jane Austen, Aristotle, and The Art of War by Sun Tzu; Don Quixote, Huckleberry Finn, and Herodotus; The Federalist Papers, The Autobiography of Malcolm X, Orwell’s 1984, and Self-Control: Its Kinship and Majesty, you’ll find one sports book, Roger Kahn’s The Boys of Summer. This book is “inspiring enough to make a man hope for another shot on the diamond and join a local soft ball crew.”4 But it also addresses the “big ideas” that philosophers, theologians, and artists have mulled over for thousands of years: What is justice? What is true friendship? What is love? What is honor? How do you live a good life? In The Boys of Summer, not only does Kahn explore such questions, but also, as he brings out, does each man on the team. [End Page 1] The title was the spark. Kahn traces the idea for his book to the evening in 1952 when he heard Dylan Thomas “sonorously” recite in tones of surpassing beauty, “I see the boys of summer in their ruin . . .”5 Over the years ideas for the book evolved, but “baseball became [his] magic portal.”6 The boys of summer, the pleasant lilt of those five syllables, the soft vowels, the bucolic connotations are only part of the first line of the poem. Kahn quotes the complete line prominently on its own page following the table of contents. Clearly it resonated with him. If your eyes are rolling, “This is a baseball journal, lady,” you won’t be surprised that Kahn’s publishers balked at the title. It comes from a poem? Poetry doesn’t sell. “Safely, prosaically, dully,” Kahn’s editor wanted to call the book The Team.7 It took months of debate for Kahn to prevail. Why did he insist? “Is there one basic point to all fine poetry?” Kahn had asked Robert Frost. “The phrase . . . a clutch of words that gives you a clutch at the heart.”8 And that is why The Boys of Summer and not The Team became the title of Kahn’s book. The Team conjures naught, while The Boys of Summer is so loaded with color and suggestion it became a baseball meme, a synonym for ballplayers in their fleeting prime.9 In 1959 Kahn wrote an article about Babe Ruth for Esquire, in which he stated, “I set down the big man as he really was, with the booze, the babes, the insensitivity, the excess, as well as the howitzer homeruns.” Kahn was creating innovative sports journalism, he says, “hard- edged but not cruel . . . making a hero mortal but scarcely ordinary.”10 That article won the E. P. Dutton Prize for best sports magazine article of the year, reinforcing the approach, Kahn says, that was critical to The Boys of Summer. “In an era of hero worship,” Carl Erskine said, “Kahn...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207