MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321360606 · doi:10.1353/mat.2022.0010

Clever Maids, Fearless Jacks, and a Cat: Fairy Tales from a Living Oral Tradition ed. by Anita Best, Martin Lovelace, and Pauline Greenhill

2022· article· en· W4321360606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Millie Tullis

Bibliographic record

VenueMarvels & Tales · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolkloristicsFolklorePower (physics)Art historyHistoryOral traditionLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Clever Maids, Fearless Jacks, and a Cat: Fairy Tales from a Living Oral Tradition ed. by Anita Best, Martin Lovelace, and Pauline Greenhill Millie Tullis (bio) Clever Maids, Fearless Jacks, and a Cat: Fairy Tales from a Living Oral Tradition. Edited by Anita Best, Martin Lovelace, and Pauline Greenhill, Utah State University Press, 2019, 313 pp. Clever Maids, Fearless Jacks, and a Cat: Fairy Tales from a Living Oral Tradition, edited by Anita Best, Martin Lovelace, and Pauline Greenhill, highlights the talents of two Newfoundland oral storytellers, Philip Pius Power and Alice Lannon, "whose many long and complex stories show just what artistry is possible without the written word" (3). The tales of Power and Lannon are framed by imaginative, original illustrations by Graham Blair at the beginning of each chapter, and are followed by relevant ATU tale types, motifs, and a concise but detailed commentary section from the editors. The three editors share interest in fairy-tale studies and Newfoundland folklore. Anita Best has an honorary doctorate from Memorial University based on her work as a singer, storyteller, and folklorist working with Newfoundland [End Page 321] culture; she recorded and transcribed Power's tales. Martin Lovelace was an associate professor of Folklore at Memorial University and recorded and transcribed Lannon's tales. Pauline Greenhill is a professor of women's and gender studies at the University of Winnipeg and edited Transgressive Tales: Queering the Grimms (2012) with Kay Turner. Lannon grew up the daughter of a Newfoundland teacher and received a good education (21). She was greatly influenced by her grandmother's oral tales and primarily told her stories in family settings and frequently to children. Power was a fisherman who told stories to family and friends as well as in more public settings. He often incorporated his audience into his stories "referring to their habits or relatives" or calling on themes relevant to significant events in their lives (29). In the introduction, the editors provide brief histories of Newfoundland as Lannon and Power knew it during the twentieth century. Their account of Newfoundland culture stresses the cultural significance of oral traditions and "good talk" (5). The editors highlight how these living tales are "passed along a network of people" recalling and creating relationships (11). "When narrators tell the tales, they remember not merely words and a plot but also . . . the sound of a voice and often also the warmth of a relationship or a desire to communicate obliquely something that social norms forbid saying directly" (11). Clever Maids emphasizes the living nature of these oral tales, using a transcription method that shows the "interplay between teller and audience" (15). The editor's ethnopoetic transcriptions combine the work of Dell Hymes and Dennis Tedlock to maintain the "word-for-word" nature of Hymes's transcriptions and the "pauses in speech evident on audio recordings" in Tedlock's transcriptions (293). As the "oral fairy tale . . . is never the same tale twice," these transcriptions show the construction of oral tales through familiar but flexible formulas (15). The oral nature of these tales is also reflected in the tales' relationships to similar tales. The tales in Clever Maids do not fit neatly into familiar tale types; most of the tales intersect with several tale-types, which the authors list out. By cataloging the comparable tale types and motifs, the editors illustrate the "flexible, creatively variable" nature of oral tale performance and development in these tales (15). Therefore, Clever Maids works powerfully against the canonizing effect of older published anthologies of fairy tales that seem to cement dynamic tales into one rendering. The organization of the tales frequently emphasizes this flexibility as well; tales such as Power's "Peg Bearskin" and Lannon's "The Clever Girls" are placed next to each other and analyzed in direct conversation with each other in a shared commentary section. However, the editors' commentary sections do not merely connect each tale to the relevant tale type and motif index classifications for comparative purposes. As "identifying folk narratives . . . is not an end in itself," the editors [End Page 322] spend most of their commentary connecting these unique tales to existing fairy-tale research, discussing the role of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarvels & TalesSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207