MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321361481 · doi:10.22111/sedj.2022.42494.1207

The Effect of the Minimum wage on the Income Distribution of Developingband Developed Countries

2022· article· en· W4321361481 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nasim Asharieen, Hadi Arabi, Omid Ali Adeli

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor market dynamics and wage inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimum wageIncome distributionDistribution (mathematics)EconomicsLabour economicsWageDemographic economicsMathematicsInequality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Appropriate distribution of income and reduction of inequality are one of the government’s goals. Different policies and tools are used to achieve this and the minimum wage is one of them. In this study, the effects of minimum wages on income distribution, due to the most similarities in development and per capita income were studied in 7 selected developing countries including (Pakistan, Armenia, Iran, Belarus, Chile, Egypt, Georgia) and 7 selected developed/development countries including (USA, France, Japan, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada) with generalized minimum squares from the years 2000 to 2020. The results show that, in developing and developed countries, an increase in the minimum wage, improves income distribution and the effects of this policy in developed countries are much greater than in developing countries. Therefore, developing and developed countries should increase the minimum wage in proportion to the rate of inflation to progress and improve income distribution.Appropriate distribution of income and reduction of inequality are one of the government’s goals. Different policies and tools are used to achieve this and the minimum wage is one of them. In this study, the effects of minimum wages on income distribution, due to the most similarities in development and per capita income were studied in 7 selected developing countries including (Pakistan, Armenia, Iran, Belarus, Chile, Egypt, Georgia) and 7 selected developed/development countries including (USA, France, Japan, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada) with generalized minimum squares from the years 2000 to 2020. The results show that, in developing and developed countries, an increase in the minimum wage, improves income distribution and the effects of this policy in developed countries are much greater than in developing countries. Therefore, developing and developed countries should increase the minimum wage in proportion to the rate of inflation to progress and improve income distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicLabor market dynamics and wage inequality→French-language works237,207→