Data Collection System of IoT Based on the Coordination of Drones and Unmanned Surface Vehicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the continuous renewal and rise of various flight equipment, this article designs a method of water data collection, which is realized through the coordination of an unmanned surface vehicle (USV) carrying unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, commonly called drones). In reality, multiple UAVs take-off and landing sites, energy consumption, and other complex issues closely related to USV recovery, UAVs must be considered. If mixed integer linear programming (MILP) is used directly, it is difficult to get satisfactory results in an acceptable time range. Therefore, a heuristic algorithm is proposed to solve the problem of data collection by these devices, which can not only quickly solve the large-scale collaborative optimization problem, but also rationally utilize the total energy consumption of the equipment. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is verified and analyzed by experimenting a different number of monitoring nodes, different number of UAVs and different task time. It can not only shorten the cycle of data acquisition task, but also reduce the waiting time of the UAV and USV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".