Modeling the impact of public health education on tungiasis dynamics with saturated treatment: Insight through the Caputo fractional derivative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Public health education is pivotal in the management and control of infectious and non-infectious diseases. This manuscript presents and analyses a nonlinear fractional model of tungiasis dynamics with the impact of public health education for the first time. The human population is split into five classes depending on their disease status. The infected population is split into two subgroups; infected but unaware and infected but aware. The model focuses on the impacts of public health education, contact and treatment contact on tungiasis transmission dynamics. Notably, public health education is important for containing as well as reducing disease outbreaks in communities. The Caputo fractional derivative is utilised in defining the model governing equations. Model equilibrium points existence and stability are investigated using simple matrix algebra. Model analysis shows that tungiasis is contained when the reproduction number is less than unity. Otherwise, if it is greater than unity, the disease persists and spread in the population. The generalised Adams-Bashforth-Moulton approach is utilised in solving the derived tungiasis model numerically. The impacts of public health education, treatment and contact rate on overall disease dynamics are discussed through numerical simulations. From the simulations, we see that for given fractional order, public health education and treatment increase the quality of life plus reduce equilibrium numbers of tungiasis-infected individuals. We observe that population classes converge quicker to their steady states when α is increased. Thus, we can conclude that the derivative order α captures the role of experience or knowledge that individuals have on the disease's history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".