MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321368652 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.108999

Myeloarchitectonic cortical parcellation data for contemporary neuroimaging – the Vogt-Vogt legacy in the 21st century

2023· article· en· W4321368652 on OpenAlexafffund
Niels Alexander Foit, Seles Yung, Hyo Min Lee, Andrea Bernasconi, Neda Bernasconi, Seok‐Jun Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada First Research Excellence FundInstitute for Basic ScienceAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgSungkyunkwan UniversityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
KeywordsNeuroimagingData sciencePsychologyNeuroscienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obtaining precise and detailed parcellations of the human brain has been a major focus of neuroscience research. Here, we present a multimodal dataset, MYATLAS, based on histology-derived myeloarchitectonic parcellations for use with contemporary neuroimaging analyses software. The core of MYATLAS is a novel 3D neocortical, surface-based atlas derived from legacy myeloarchitectonic histology studies. Additionally, we provide digitized quantitative laminar profiles of intracortical myelin content derived from postmortem photometric data, cross-correlated with in vivo myeloarchitectonic features obtained by quantitative MRI mapping. Moreover, congregated, digitized and quality-improved Vogt-Vogt legacy histology data is made available. Finally, to allow for cross-modality correlations, maps of quantitative myelin estimates and corresponding von Economo-Koskinas’ cytoarchitectonic features are also included. We share all necessary surface and volume-based registration files as well as shell scripts to facilitate applications of MYATLAS to future in vivo MRI studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.243
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207