MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321368656 · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2023.02.021

Extending the kinematic theory of rapid movements with new primitives

2023· article· en· W4321368656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePattern Recognition Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaMinisterio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de EspañaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadFundación CajaCanariasFederación Española de Enfermedades RarasEuropean Commission
KeywordsKinematicsTrajectoryGaussianComputer scienceMathematicsLog-normal distributionRepresentation (politics)Bounded functionAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematical analysisClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kinematic Theory of rapid movements, and its associated Sigma-Lognormal, model 2D spatiotemporal trajectories. It is constructed mainly as a temporal overlap of curves between virtual target points. Specifically, it uses an arc and a lognormal as primitives for the representation of the trajectory and velocity, respectively. This paper proposes developing this model, in what we call the Kinematic Theory Transform, which establishes a mathematical framework that allows further primitives to be used. Mainly, we evaluate Euler curves to link virtual target points and Gaussian, Beta, Gamma, Double-bounded lognormal, and Generalized Extreme Value functions to model the bell-shaped velocity profile. Using these primitives, we report reconstruction results with spatiotemporal trajectories executed by human beings, animals, and anthropomorphic robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it