MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321369850 · doi:10.1364/oe.481313

Rapid ultraviolet photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy using voice-coil stage scanning

2023· article· en· W4321369850 on OpenAlexafffund
Brendyn D. Cikaluk, Brendon S. Restall, Nathaniel J. M. Haven, Matthew T. Martell, Ewan A. McAlister, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicroscopyOpticsUltravioletResolution (logic)HistologyBiomedical engineeringComputer sciencePathologyMedicinePhysicsOptoelectronicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an unmet need for fast virtual histology technologies that exhibit histological realism and can scan large sections of fresh tissue within intraoperative time-frames. Ultraviolet photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy (UV-PARS) is an emerging imaging modality capable of producing virtual histology images that show good concordance to conventional histology stains. However, a UV-PARS scanning system that can perform rapid intraoperative imaging over mm-scale fields-of-view at fine resolution (<500 nm) has yet to be demonstrated. In this work, we present a UV-PARS system which utilizes voice-coil stage scanning to demonstrate finely resolved images for 2×2 mm 2 areas at 500 nm sampling resolution in 1.33 minutes and coarsely resolved images for 4×4 mm 2 areas at 900 nm sampling resolution in 2.5 minutes. The results of this work demonstrate the speed and resolution capabilities of the UV-PARS voice-coil system and further develop the potential for UV-PARS microscopy to be employed in a clinical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207