A Novel Fatty Acid Metabolism-Associated Risk Model for Prognosis Prediction in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the most common acute leukaemia in adults, with an unfavourable outcome and a high rate of recurrence due to its heterogeneity. Dysregulation of fatty acid metabolism plays a crucial role in the development of several tumours. However, the value of fatty acid metabolism (FAM) in the progression of AML remains unclear. In this study, we obtained RNA sequencing and corresponding clinicopathological information from the TCGA and GEO databases. Univariate Cox regression analysis and subsequent LASSO Cox regression analysis were utilized to identify prognostic FAM-related genes and develop a potential prognostic risk model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for prognostic significances. We also performed ROC curve to illustrate that the risk model in prognostic prediction has good performance. Moreover, significant differences in immune infiltration landscape were found between high-risk and low-risk groups using ESTIMATE and CIBERSOT algorithms. In the end, differential expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to preliminarily explore the possible signaling pathways related to the prognosis of FAM and AML. The results of our study may provide potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for AML patients, which is conducive to individualized precision therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".