A Novel Pipeline Age Evaluation: Considering Overall Condition Index and Neural Network Based on Measured Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today, the chemical corrosion of metals is one of the main problems of large productions, especially in the oil and gas industries. Due to massive downtime connected to corrosion failures, pipeline corrosion is a central issue in many oil and gas industries. Therefore, the determination of the corrosion progress of oil and gas pipelines is crucial for monitoring the reliability and alleviation of failures that can positively impact health, safety, and the environment. Gas transmission and distribution pipes and other structures buried (or immersed) in an electrolyte, by the existing conditions and due to the metallurgical structure, are corroded. After some time, this disrupts an active system and process by causing damage. The worst corrosion for metals implanted in the soil is in areas where electrical currents are lost. Therefore, cathodic protection (CP) is the most effective method to prevent the corrosion of structures buried in the soil. Our aim in this paper is first to investigate the effect of stray currents on failure rate using the condition index, and then to estimate the remaining useful life of CP gas pipelines using an artificial neural network (ANN). Predicting future values using previous data based on the time series feature is also possible. Therefore, this paper first uses the general equipment condition monitoring method to detect failures. The time series model of data is then measured and operated by neural networks. Finally, the amount of failure over time is determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".