MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321371912 · doi:10.3390/math11041060

New Results Involving the Generalized Krätzel Function with Application to the Fractional Kinetic Equations

2023· article· en· W4321371912 on OpenAlexaff
Asifa Tassaddiq, Rekha Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMajmaah University
KeywordsFractional calculusLaplace transformMittag-Leffler functionMathematicsFunction (biology)Representation (politics)Applied mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sun is a basic component of the natural environment and kinetic equations are important mathematical models to assess the rate of change of chemical composition of a star such as the sun. In this article, a new fractional kinetic equation is formulated and solved using generalized Krätzel integrals because the nuclear reaction rate in astrophysics is represented in terms of these integrals. Furthermore, new identities involving Fox–Wright function are discussed and used to simplify the results. We compute new fractional calculus formulae involving the Krätzel function by using Kiryakova’s fractional integral and derivative operators which led to several new identities for a variety of other classic fractional transforms. A number of new identities for the generalized Krätzel function are then analyzed in relation to the H-function. The closed form of such results is also expressible in terms of Mittag-Leffler function. Distributional representation of Krätzel function and its Laplace transform has been essential in achieving the goals of this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207