MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321371952 · doi:10.3390/axioms12020223

Impact of Goodwill on Consumer Buying through Advertising in a Segmented Market: An Optimal Control Theoretic Approach

2023· article· en· W4321371952 on OpenAlexaff
Pradeep Kumar, Kuldeep Chaudhary, Vijay Kumar, Sudipa Chauhan

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoodwillMarket segmentationAdvertisingProduct (mathematics)BusinessMarketingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Market segmentation is one of the key marketing activities to target the potential market for a product, which allows the firm to have a better understanding of their customers. This paper considers an optimal control problem to determine the dynamic price and advertising policies of a new product introduction in a segment-specific market incorporating advertising-based goodwill. Under differentiated advertising and single-channel advertising, advertising efforts increase the stock of goodwill in each segment. Single-channel advertising starts in all segments with a fixed segment spectrum, while the differentiated advertising process deals with each segment independently. The explicit optimal dynamic advertising effort and price strategies are obtained by applying Pontryagin’s maximum principle, and local stability of equilibria have also been examined. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated through numerical examples, and a local sensitivity analysis is performed to find the sensitive parameters that can affect the optimal values of price and advertising effort rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAxiomsSame topicInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207