Bibliographic record
Abstract
The MCS lock of Mellor-Crummey and Scott (1991), 23 pages. is a very efficient first-come first-served mutual-exclusion algorithm that uses the atomic hardware primitives fetch-and-store and compare-and-swap. However, it has the disadvantage that the calling thread must provide a pointer to an allocated record. This additional parameter violates the standard locking interface, which has only the lock as a parameter. Hence, it is impossible to switch to MCS without editing and recompiling an application that uses locks. This article provides a variation of MCS with the standard interface, which remains FCFS, called MCSH. One key ingredient is to stack allocate the necessary record in the acquire procedure of the lock, so its life-time only spans the delay to enter a critical section. A second key ingredient is communicating the allocated record between the acquire and release procedures through the lock to maintain the standard locking interface. Both of these practices are known to practitioners, but our solution combines them in a unique way. Furthermore, when these practices are used in prior papers, their correctness is often argued informally. The correctness of MCSH is verified rigorously with the proof assistant PVS, and experiments are run to compare its performance with MCS and similar locks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".