MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321375669 · doi:10.24319/jtpk.13.195-207

PENGELOLAAN PERIKANAN HIU DI PELABUHAN PERIKANAN PANTAI TEGALSARI TEGAL

2023· article· id· W4321375669 on OpenAlexaff
Heppy Septiawan, Bayu Primasari

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknologi Perikanan dan Kelautan · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and Coastal Ecosystems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsForestryFisheryGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ikan hiu adalah jenis ikan bertulang rawan (Elasmobranchii) yang berperan sebagai predator puncak dalam rantai makanan dan juga memiliki peranan penting dalam menjaga keseimbangan ekosistem di lautan. Saat ini, keberadaan hiu terancam punah akibat aktivitas penangkapan berlebih yang disebabkan meningkatnya permintaan komoditas sirip di pasar internasional. Salah satu basis pendaratan hasil tangkapan hiu di Indonesia terletak di Pelabuhan Perikanan Pantai (PPP) Tegalsari Kota Tegal, Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Tekanan terhadap populasi hiu di kawasan ini tidak hanya berasal dari peningkatan usaha tangkapan, namun juga dari kondisi perairan dan habitat yang terus mengalami degradasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kinerja pengelolaan perikanan hiu di PPP Tegalsari dengan pendekatan Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) serta menyusun rekomendasi untuk tindakan pengelolaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kinerja pengelolaan perikanan hiu di PPP Tegalsari berada pada kondisi baik dengan nilai rata-rata keseluruhan domain sebesar 73,39. Tindakan pengelolaan diprioritaskan pada domain ekonomi dan sumber daya ikan yaitu diversifikasi usaha dan kemudahan penyediaan akses permodalan bagi rumah tangga perikanan, membuat regulasi pembatasan upaya penangkapan dan ukuran minimal ikan hiu yang boleh ditangkap; serta peningkatan pengawasan terkait selektivitas alat tangkap dan metode penangkapan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Teknologi Perikanan dan KelautanSame topicMarine and Coastal EcosystemsFrench-language works237,207