A Rare <i>PDGFRA</i> Exon 15 Germline Mutation Identified in a Patient With Phenotypic Manifestations Concerning for GIST-Plus Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular alterations in PDGFRA are well-described as drivers of sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and inflammatory fibroid polyps (IFPs). However, a small number of families with germline PDGFRA mutations in exons 12, 14, and 18 have been reported, forming the basis of an autosomal dominant inherited disorder with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity, now referred to as PDGFRA-mutant syndrome or GIST-plus syndrome. Phenotypic manifestations of this rare syndrome include multiple gastrointestinal GISTS, IFPs, fibrous tumors, and other variable features. Herein, we report the case of a 58-year-old female who presented with a gastric GIST and numerous small intestinal IFPs, found to harbor a previously undescribed germline PDGFRA exon 15 p.G680R mutation. Somatic tumor testing was performed on the GIST, a duodenal IFP, and an ileal IFP utilizing a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, revealing additional and distinct secondary PDGFRA exon 12 somatic mutations in each of the 3 tumors. Our findings raise important considerations regarding mechanisms of tumor development in patients with underlying germline PDGFRA alterations and highlight the potential utility of expanding currently available germline and somatic testing panels to include exons outside the typical hotspot regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".