MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321378527 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106209

Detection and impact of short-range order in medium/high-entropy alloys

2023· review· en· W4321378527 on OpenAlexafffund
Tyler Joe Ziehl, David J. Morris, Peng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceCanadian Light SourceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsHigh entropy alloysMaterials scienceDiffractionShort range orderNanotechnologyEntropy (arrow of time)MicrostructureThermodynamicsCrystallographyOpticsChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medium/High-entropy alloys (MEAs/HEAs) have attracted much attention during the past two decades and have been studied extensively owing to their excellent physical and mechanical properties. These materials form simple lattice structures and thermodynamically favored single-phase solutions. Despite having a single-phase, the local structure of MEAs/HEAs still contain some degree of order. Recently, short-range order (SRO) has been studied to better understand the local structure of MEAs/HEAs and how this order impacts their properties. Efforts to characterize SRO in high-entropy alloys have included non-imaging methods such as X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, as well as imaging methods such as transmission electron microscopy-based techniques. In this perspective, structural studies using non-imaging and imaging techniques to investigate SRO in MEAs/HEAs are discussed. Moreover, the impact of SRO on the physical and mechanical properties of MEAs/HEAs is also covered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207