MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321379425 · doi:10.21009/parameter.342.02

IMPLEMENTASI GERAKAN LITERASI SEKOLAH (GLS) DI SD NEGERI RANON 1 KECAMATAN PAKUNIRAN KABUPATEN PROBOLINGGO

2023· article· id· W4321379425 on OpenAlexaff
Dzaky Isyuniandri, Fiana Agustin, Tri Utami Prastyaningsih, Tria Puji Lestari, Muhimma Yatun Nisa’ul Ulya

Bibliographic record

VenuePARAMETER Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Jakarta · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GLS yaitu kemampuan menelusuri, mengetahui, dan mendayagunakan benda secara cerdas dengan bermacam-macam aktifitas diantaranya membaca, melihat, mendengar, menulis serta berbicara. GLS dilaksanakan secara global guna mentransformasikan sekolah sebagai tempat pembelajaran yang masyarakatnya melek alfabet selama hidup melalui partisipasi masyarakat (Kemendikbud, 2016). GLS partisipatif menyertakan masyarakat sekolah (siswa, pengajar, kepala sekolah, pengawas sekolah, komite sekolah, orang tua siswa), peneliti, dll). GLS mampu membentuk pergerakan yang bersifat sosial melalui dukungan kerjasama berasal berbagai bidang, sehingga menjadi kenyataan berupa kebiasaan membaca peserta didik. Penyesuaian ini dilaksanakan menggunakan aktivitas membaca 15 menit pra-pembelajaran yang bertujuan untuk pengembangan karakter peserta didik melalui penanaman sistem literasi sekolah, yang diimpelentasikan pada GL atau Membaca Sekolah, sebagai akibatnya peserta didik disebut pembelajar sepanjang hayat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePARAMETER Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Negeri JakartaSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207