Non-Invasive Sensor-Based Estimation of Anterior-Posterior Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening Maximal Distension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia management relies on the evaluation of the temporospatial kinematic events of swallowing performed in videofluoroscopy (VF) by trained clinicians. The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening distension represents one of the important kinematic events that contribute to healthy swallowing. Insufficient distension of UES opening can lead to an accumulation of pharyngeal residue and subsequent aspiration which in turn can lead to adverse outcomes such as pneumonia. VF is usually used for the temporal and spatial evaluation of the UES opening; however, VF is not available in all clinical settings and may be inappropriate or undesirable for some patients. High resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA) is a noninvasive technology that uses neck-attached sensors and machine learning to characterize swallowing physiology by analyzing the swallow-induced vibrations/sounds in the anterior neck region. We investigated the ability of HRCA to noninvasively estimate the maximal distension of anterior-posterior (A-P) UES opening as accurately as the measurements performed by human judges from VF images. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Trained judges performed the kinematic measurement of UES opening duration and A-P UES opening maximal distension on 434 swallows collected from 133 patients. We used a hybrid convolutional recurrent neural network supported by attention mechanisms which takes HRCA raw signals as input and estimates the value of the A-P UES opening maximal distension as output. RESULTS: The proposed network estimated the A-P UES opening maximal distension with an absolute percentage error of 30% or less for more than 64.14% of the swallows in the dataset. CONCLUSION: This study provides substantial evidence for the feasibility of using HRCA to estimate one of the key spatial kinematic measurements used for dysphagia characterization and management. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement: The findings in this study have a direct impact on dysphagia diagnosis and management through providing a non-invasive and cheap way to estimate one of the most important swallowing kinematics, the UES opening distension, that contributes to safe swallowing. This study, along with other studies that utilize HRCA for swallowing kinematic analysis, paves the way for developing a widely available and easy-to-use tool for dysphagia diagnosis and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".