MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321382325 · doi:10.1017/9781009329866.006

For Whom the Bell Tolls: Popular Resistance and the Beginning of the Global Sixties in Pakistan

2023· other· en· W4321382325 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpposition (politics)PoliticsPresidential systemDemocracyPolitical scienceBureaucracyTribunalVerdictLawPolitical economySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1958, when Ayub Khan staged his coup d’état, the streets of East Pakistani towns remained calm. After nearly a decade of palace intrigues, with its unstable ministerial coalitions, its game of political musical chairs for the positions of prime minister and chief minister and its suppression of popular electoral verdict, people were alienated from political processes. This was also a period of political transition when pivotal figures of Bengal politics – Fazlul Huq, Suhrawardy and Khawaja Nazimuddin – passed away in the consecutive years of 1962, 1963 and 1964. In 1965 a coalition of opposition political parties made their last desperate bid to uninstall the Ayub Khan regime through the shambolic presidential election instituted by Ayub Khan. The combined opposition parties selected Fatima Jinnah, sister of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, as their candidate. Fatima Jinnah would have been a formidable consensus candidate if Pakistan had had a universal adult franchise, but under conditions of the Basic Democracy regime, Fatima Jinnah had to win over the ‘Basic Democrats’ who were beholden to Ayub Khan for access to the position of power. The defeat of Fatima Jinnah foreclosed the possibility of removing the military-bureaucratic regime through lawful constitutional opposition and electoral mobilization. Under the shadow of the garrison state, politics in East Pakistan evolved both within the framework of the Constitution of Pakistan and clandestine plans to liberate East Pakistan through armed revolution. In 1960 the world witnessed a radical re-alternation of the global political order with the independence of African colonies. In 1960 alone, 17 independent states emerged in Africa. Most of these newly independent states experienced political convulsions emanating from the contestation between various forms of socialist movements and dying colonial imperialism. Congo, for example, entered a political crisis with the assassination of Patrice Lumumba, and Algeria witnessed a prolonged revolution. Radical ideas of revolution informed by a global wave of national liberation in Africa and Asia impacted students’ movements in East Pakistan. A tacit understanding between the Awami League and the CPP (East Pakistan Provincial Committee) produced a united front among those students who were against the military-bureaucratic regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0300.021
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle EastFrench-language works237,207