Recursos del cine y enseñanza de la bioética en las ciencias del movimiento humano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen Este estudio descriptivo y exploratorio, realizado con egresados del Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias del Movimiento Humano de la Universidad do Estado de Santa Catarina, pretende conocer las ventajas de utilizar películas en la enseñanza de la bioética e identificar obras cinematográficas relacionadas con actividad física y salud en las ciencias del movimiento humano. Se utilizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas, y se aplicó el análisis de contenido a los datos. Las categorías a priori partieron de los objetivos, y las respuestas de los participantes generaron subcategorías a posteriori: Aportes del aprendizaje de la bioética para el Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias del Movimiento Humano y la vida profesional; y el uso del cine como recurso pedagógico, con sugerencias de películas y temas específicos. Los recursos del cine promueven un aprendizaje más significativo y placentero al posibilitar una aproximación de los estudiantes a los contenidos bioéticos de la profesión, facilitando el aprendizaje.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".