MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An E-Government Portal Maturity Model

2022· book-chapter· en· W4321384565 on OpenAlexaff
Laila Cheikhi, Abdoullah Fath-Allah, Rafa E. Al-Qutaish, Ali Idri, Alain Abran

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in civil and industrial engineering book series · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicE-Government and Public Services
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapability Maturity ModelMaturity (psychological)Government (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Computer scienceBest practiceKey (lock)Knowledge managementWorld Wide WebBusinessProcess managementData scienceComputer securityGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E-government portals are now playing an important role in facilitating citizens' lives by executing services at any time and from any location. Such a way of providing services results in great benefits for citizens and agencies, particularly within the COVID-19 pandemic context. Over the past few years, a number of best practices have been identified for designing and developing e-government portals but have been documented piecewise across the literature. A key approach to facilitating access to such best practices is their integration into a structured maturity model tailored to a domain of application. A digital twin is a digital representation of a physical object or system. However, data from the e-government, which is a part of what is called smart city, can be transferred to a digital twin to work with other data from other systems, such as IoT systems. Thus, these insights can be used to make better decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.017
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in civil and industrial engineering book seriesSame topicE-Government and Public ServicesFrench-language works237,207