Contextualizing Laudato si in the Philippines: Environmental Problem in Purok 1A, Hapay na Mangga, Barangay Dolores, Taytay, Rizal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laudato si (2015) is a landmark encyclical in the teachings of the Catholic Church concerning the environment. While the Church has issued encyclicals before on social teaching, and briefly mentioned the environment in previous encyclicals, this is the first time that social teaching has been put deeply into the context of an encyclical devoted primarily to the environment. This calls for a reassessment of the peoples’ perceptions on how they care for the environment in the Philippine context. A case study was conducted in a rural area near Metro Manila in the Province of Rizal. This paper reports the views of 47 respondents (N=47) from Purok 1A, Hapay na Mangga, Barangay Dolores, Taytay, Rizal, Philippines, aged from 18 to 60 years old. The Descriptive results of statistics and thematic analyses of respondents’ responses were based on the Care for the Environment Scale (CES) developed by the researcher in this study. The CES revealed significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents about how they care for their environment. This case study illustrates how this research can be used to inform all the people to initiate programs based on the ethics of care and the encyclical Laudato si. References Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluationinput. Retrieved on January 12, 2019, from http://www2.pathfinder.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdfCaritas Internationalis. (2009). Climate justice: Seeking a global ethic. Vatican City: Caritas Internationalis Press.Cobb Jr., J. B., & Caster, I. (eds.). 2015. For our common home: Processrelational responses to Laudato si’. Anoka, MN: Process Century Press.Cuomo, Ch. (2011). Climate change, vulnerability, and responsibility. Hypatia, 26: 690–714.Das, J. and B.C. Acharya, 2003. Hydrology and assessment of lotic water quality in Cuttack city, India. Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 150: 163-175. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026193514875Henson, R. (2006). The Rough Guide to Climate Change. London: Rough Guides Ltd.Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, PearsonEducation, Inc.Lonergan, B. (1971). Insight and method in theology. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. (2004). Compendium of the social doctrine of the church. Vatican City: Libreria EditriceVaticana.Pope Paul VI. (1967). Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio.26 March. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Pope Paul VI. (1976). Message for the 1977 World Day of Peace. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Pope John Paul II. (1990). Peace with God the creator, Peace with all of creation. Message for the World Day of Peace.1 January.Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Pope Benedict XVI. (2009). Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate. 29 June. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Pope Benedict XVI. (2010). If you want to cultivate peace, protect creation. Message for the 2010 World Day of Peace.1 January.Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Pope Francis. (2015a). Encyclical Letter Laudato si’: On care for our common home. 24 May. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice VaticanaPope Francis. (2015b). Presentation of the christmas greetings to the Roman Curia. 21 December. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Sandler, R. (2005). Introduction: Environmental virtue ethics. In Sandler, R., Ph. Cafaro (eds.) Environmental Virtues Ethics(pp. 1–14).Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.Sarantakos, S. (2013). Social research (2nd ed.). Australia: Macmillan Education.Schaeffer, F.A. (1970). Pollution and the death of man: The Christian view of ecology. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House.Whyte, Kyle Powys and Chris Cuomo. (2017). Ethics of caring in environmental ethics: Indigenous and feminist philosophies” inThe Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. Stephen M. Gardiner and Allen Thompson (eds.) DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199941339.013.2 Yisa, J. and T. Jimoh, 2010. Analytical studies on water quality index of river landzu. Am. J. Applied Sci., 7: 453-458. DOI:10.3844/ajassp.2010.453.458Yu, L. and N.N.B. Salvador, 2005. Modelling water quality in rivers. Am. J. Applied Sci., 2: 881-886. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2005.881.886
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".