MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

El encuentro como respuesta a la crisis de sentido. La propuesta de Joseph Ratzinger

2021· article· en· W4321451749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueColetânea · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsMonsanto (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)SecularizationFaithPhilosophyHumanitiesTheologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The secularized and technological society in which we live in, for decades, has suffered from a crisis of meaning, which makes it difficult for human beings to find answers to the fundamental questions of existence. At times, it plunges you into substitute customs for religion that are equally harmful. This study addresses the problem based on the bibliographic review of some texts by Joseph Ratzinger, both in his stage as theologian, and as Pope Benedict XVI. According to his reflections, it can be said that it is a persistent problem, not only in the author’s thought, but in society as a whole. Once more the need of an encounter with the faith is proposed. This is grounded in the relational nature of the human being, as a way out of the crisis, or as a new discovery of the meaning of human life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it