MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321453981 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101822

Born into an isolating world: family-centred care for babies born to mothers with COVID-19

2023· article· en· W4321453981 on OpenAlexaff
G. Dowse, E.J. Perkins, Howard Stein, Giovanna Chidini, Olivier Danhaive, Y.N. Elsayed, Werther Brunow de Carvalho, N. Al-Naqeeb, S. Rooze, Merih Çetınkaya, S. Vetter-Laracy, J. Pilar Orive, Paul Torpiano, Walusa Assad Gonçalves‐Ferri, Danilo Buonsenso, Bjarte Rogdo, Antonio Ramos‐De la Medina, Angelo Polito, C.N.M. Brouwer, Martin C. J. Kneyber, Danièle De Luca, David G. Tingay, A. MedinaVillanueva, Jessica Shoemaker, B. Piersigilli, O. Bekkouch, A.A. Oliveira, Renata Morello, Vera Lúcia Jornada Krebs, Piero Valentini, S.M.H. Sabbour, Amgad Hegazi, P. Sammut, David Pace, M. Roldán, F.J. Pilar-Orive, Beril Yaşa, Emmanuelle Letamendia-Richard, G. Regiroli, Alexandre Vivanti, R. Centorrino, Nilton Ferraro Oliveira, M.H.M. Dittrich, R. Felgueira, Christian Neves, Pierre Tissières, Angela Amigoni, Marco Daverio, A. Tosoni, Maya C. André, Brian Wagner, Thomas Riedel, Peter C. Rimensberger, Anne‐Sylvie Ramelet, Marie‐Hélène Perez, Mark Marston, Vivianne Chanez, David Longchamp, Julia Natterer, Thomas Ferry, Barbara Brotschi

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilState Government of VictoriaRoyal Children's Hospital FoundationChildren's Hospital Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticPediatricsCohortCohort studyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Prospective cohort studyPandemicPregnancyObstetricsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The benefits of facilitating breastmilk feeding and close contact between mother and neonate (family-centred care; FCC) in the perinatal period are well-established. The aim of this study was to determine how the delivery of FCC practices were impacted for neonates born to mothers with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Neonates born to mothers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy were identified from the 'EsPnIC Covid paEdiatric NeonaTal REgistry' (EPICENTRE) multinational cohort between 10 March 2020 and 20 October 2021. The EPICENTRE cohort collected prospective data on FCC practices. Rooming-in and breastmilk feeding practice were the main outcomes, and factors influencing each were determined. Other outcomes included mother-baby physical contact prior to separation and the pattern of FCC components relative to time and local site guidelines. Findings: 692 mother-baby dyads (13 sites, 10 countries) were analysed. 27 (5%) neonates were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (14 (52%) asymptomatic). Most sites had policies that encouraged FCC during perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection for most of the reporting period. 311 (46%) neonates roomed-in with their mother during the admission. Rooming-in increased over time from 23% in March-June 2020 to 74% in January-March 2021 (boreal season). 330 (93%) of the 369 separated neonates had no FCC physical contact with their mother prior, and 319 (86%) were asymptomatic. Maternal breastmilk was used for feeding in 354 (53%) neonates, increasing from 23% to 70% between March-June 2020 and January-March 2021. FCC was most impacted when mothers had symptomatic COVID-19 at birth. Interpretation: This is the largest report of global FCC practice during the COVID-19 pandemic to date. The COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted FCC despite low perinatal transmission rates. Fortunately, clinicians appear to have adapted to allow more FCC delivery as the COVID-19 pandemic progressed. Funding: The National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia): Grant ID 2008212 (DGT), Royal Children's Hospital Foundation: Grant ID 2019-1155 (EJP), Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207