MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321455614 · doi:10.9734/ajmah/2023/v21i4802

Exploring the Factors Influencing Home Delivery: A Cross Sectional Study among Rural Residents in Tamale Metropolis

2023· article· en· W4321455614 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abdul-Samed Mohammed, Vida Nyagre Yakong, Elizabeth Twumasi, Ayabah Ruth Apuswin, Christiana Ameyaw, Albert Ajapoak Atuga, Francis Kronzu Cudjoe

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Medicine and Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCross-sectional studyQuarter (Canadian coin)Thematic analysisQualitative researchQualitative propertyRural areaDescriptive statisticsEnvironmental healthFamily medicineNursingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Maternal and child mortality continues as a disturbing public health problem facing Ghana and other low and middle-income countries. As such there are advocacy for skilled birth delivery. Despite the advocacy, in most rural communities, unskilled delivery still persists. It is against this background that this study aims to explore the factors influencing home delivery among women in rural areas of Tamale Metropolis.
 Methods: The study employed the descriptive cross-sectional design with the mixed method approach. The study recruited 200 women within reproductive age of 18-49 who had delivered at least once in the selected rural communities in the Tamale Metropolis. Questionnaire and interview guide were used to collect data for this study. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 26 and manual thematic content analysis for quantitative and qualitative data respectively.
 Results: The prevalence of home delivery was reported as (36.5%) among the respondents. More than quarter (35.5%) of the respondents rate their satisfaction of home delivery as good whereas more than half of the respondents rated TBAs’ attitude as good. Three (3) qualitative respondents indicated that most women chose to deliver at home in neglect of hospital because of better satisfaction gained from delivering at home. The qualitative data showed that the factors identified to influence home delivery were as followed: negative attitude of health workers, lack of trust in health workers competence, unnecessary expenses from hospitals, distance, and poor quality of services. Nearly 90.0% of the respondents were enrolled on the NHIS with a proof of active NHIS card. Majority of the respondents were aware of the free maternal health services and all respondents agreed that they had a CHPs compound in their communities, however, only 36.5% responded in the affirmative that these CHPs compound are resourced adequately.
 Conclusion: The study showed a substantive percentage of the respondents to be practicing home delivery with the support of unskilled birth attendants. Poor attitudes from health workers, better previous experience in delivering at home, unreliable means of transport to the hospital and additional informal delivery expenses were some of the factors found to be significant determinants of home delivery. It is recommended for the government and other stakeholders to provide rural ambulance services to aid in the transport of pregnant women in labor to the nearest health facility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Medicine and HealthSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207