MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321480992 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-5547

Using integrated magnetostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and astrochronology to evaluate the impacts of a rapidly uplifting orogen on the preservation of climate oscillations

2023· preprint· en· W4321480992 on OpenAlexaff
Amy I. Hsieh, Romain Vaucher, Ludvig Löwemark, Chorng‐Shern Horng, Andrew Tien‐Shun Lin, Shahin E. Dashtgard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMagnetostratigraphyPrecessionPaleontologyBiostratigraphyForeland basinPaleoclimatologyClimate changeSedimentationStructural basinMonsoonOrbital forcingGlacial periodOceanographyClimatologySediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in Earth’s eccentricity, obliquity, and precession can cause quasi-cyclic variations in Earth’s climate that may be preserved in sedimentary archives. Recent research has shown that shallow-marine paleoclimate archives in mid- to low-latitude regions have the potential to preserve changes in hydroclimate driven by precession, given sufficient space for sediment accumulation and a high sedimentation rate. Our integrated stratigraphic study of the Kueichulin Formation in Taiwan’s Western Foreland Basin (WFB) uses magnetostratigraphy, biostratigraphy and astrochronology to constrain time, with the aim to assess how the evolution of a rapidly uplifting mountain range affected the preservation of climate cycles in the shallow-marine record.Using time-series analysis of two sets of gamma-ray borehole data from the late Miocene to Pliocene Kueichulin Formation (WFB), we found that despite increasing monsoon intensities between 8 and 3 Ma, the preservation of precession-driven East Asian Summer Monsoon variability was low during the early stages of Taiwan orogenesis (before 5.4 Ma). Prior to 5.4 Ma, the Taiwan Strait had not yet formed. Consequently, the southeastern margin of Eurasia was open to the Pacific Ocean, and so the depositional environments in the WFB were susceptible to reworking by large waves. This led to the preservation of low-frequency eccentricity and obliquity, but not higher-frequency precession.Despite increasing basin subsidence from 5.4 to 4.9 Ma, the preservation of orbital oscillations is low. This is attributed to either low sedimentation rates at deeper water depths, which could obscure variations in sediment input or result in cycles below the resolution of the gamma-ray logging tool, or cycles not being detectible in the gamma-ray proxy record due to a lack of contrasting lithology. After 4.9 Ma and up to 3.2 Ma, the Taiwan orogen became the dominant sediment source for the WFB, and rapid growth of the orogen shielded the WFB from high-energy waves generated in the Pacific Ocean. The increased sediment influx and the formation of a semi-sheltered strait, combined with increased space for sediment accumulation in the WFB, resulted in enhanced preservation of precession-driven East Asian Summer Monsoon variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→