VFLR: An Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Framework for Logistic Regression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the explosive growth of data volume and computing capability, federated learning, which involves constructing global models over multiple data islands, has demonstrated its advantages and vast prospects in the field of machine learning. However, due to commonly vertically partitioned data, coupled with privacy concerns about data leakage, there are still some challenging issues in traditional federated learning. To tackle these challenges, in this article, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving vertical federated learning framework for logistic regression, named VFLR, where multiple participants can collaboratively perform global model training and query over their vertically partitioned data. Specifically, we first design a data aggregation matrix construction algorithm, with which the vertically partitioned data can be aggregated for high-accuracy global model training. Then, by utilizing a novel symmetric homomorphic encryption, our framework can ensure that the whole training and query processes do not leak any private information. Moreover, based on the data aggregation matrix, multi-round interactions are not required in VFLR, improving training efficiency significantly. Detailed security analysis shows that VFLR can well protect data and model information from inference attacks. In addition, extensive experiments demonstrate that VFLR has high training and query accuracy and low computation and communication overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".