MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321485419 · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00018-3

Safe care from home for complicated pregnancies?

2023· article· en· W4321485419 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Katherine L. Tucker, Richard J. McManus

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Digital Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames ValleyProgramme Grants for Applied ResearchUniversity of OxfordHypertension CanadaDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsPsychological interventionScopusHealth technologyHealth careMedicineContext (archaeology)Digital healthReimbursementEquity (law)NursingMEDLINEMedical emergencyFamily medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a move towards greater patient involvement in health care across the world, supported by rapid improvements in self-monitoring technology and widespread accessibility of devices that can be used in telemonitoring, such as smartphones. However, there is a need to understand how to integrate novel interventions into daily practice. Such organisational change can be difficult, and barriers include practical issues such as provision and management of equipment, and the costs of new technology, including reimbursement, with novel interventions sometimes not funded by the health-care service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Digital HealthSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207