Retrieval and validation of global tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) vertical profiles obtained via cloud-slicing TROPOMI partial columns

Observations of the vertical distribution of nitrogen oxides (NOx ≡ NO + NO2) in the troposphere are severely limited, despite its influence on ozone formation. Here, we derive vertical profiles of the NOx component NO2 by applying cloud-slicing to partial columns of NO2 from the space-based TROPOMI instrument. This yields seasonal means of NO2 volume mixing ratios at ~100 km resolution for multiple years (March 2018 to February 2022) on a global scale in the upper troposphere (180-320 hPa and 320-450 hPa), the middle troposphere (450-600 hPa and 600-800 hPa) and the boundary layer (800 hPa to the Earth’s surface). We evaluate our product against in situ NO2 measurements from NASA DC-8 aircraft campaigns over Canada (ARCTAS, ATom, INTEX-A), the Eastern US (ATom, SEAC4RS, INTEX-A), the North and South Atlantic (ATom), and the Central and South Pacific (ATom) and use our validated dataset to assess state-of-knowledge of global tropospheric NOx as simulated by GEOS-Chem. In the middle troposphere, cloud-sliced NO2 has a mean value of 20-40 pptv and deviates by < 5 pptv where NO2 from aircraft observations exceeds the instrument detection limit. The consistency between cloud-slicing results and aircraft observations here is due to high sampling frequency and ideal conditions for cloud-slicing. Differences with aircraft observations are larger (up to 120 pptv) in the upper troposphere between 320-180 hPa where aircraft observations may be susceptible to biases and where cloud-sliced NO2 data are relatively sparse. In the boundary layer, retrievals consistent with the aircraft observations are only possible over marine environments where NO2 concentrations differ by < 35 pptv compared to > 450 pptv over terrestrial regions. This is because large land-based NOx sources cause steep vertical NO2 gradients that are problematic for cloud-slicing which assumes NO2 is well mixed throughout the troposphere. We find that NO2 concentrations above the Eastern US differ by < 20 pptv when comparing cloud-sliced tropospheric vertical profiles to simulated vertical profiles from the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. However, GEOS-Chem consistently underestimates concentrations of NO2 in the remote troposphere, simulating concentrations that are 50% less than the mean cloud-sliced NO2 observations. This is a result of the limited number of current NO2 observations used to validate models like GEOS-Chem which are limited in both time and space. By deriving tropospheric vertical profiles from cloud-slicing satellite observations there is an opportunity to obtain routine NO2 observations which can then be compared to aircraft measurements and simulations from the GEOS-Chem model. From this, we can determine the environmental factors that impact tropospheric NOx on a global scale and address long-standing uncertainties in our understanding of NOx in the troposphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.