MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessment of Sensory Block During Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Prospective Cohort Study to Determine the Influence of the Direction of Testing

2023· article· en· W4321489504 on OpenAlexaff
E.C. De Souza Soares, M. Balki, K. Downey, X.Y. Ye, J.C.A. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSensory systemStandardizationBlock (permutation group theory)AnesthesiaProspective cohort studySurgeryCognitive psychologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

( Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth . 2022;69:750–755) Sensory block, or a decreased sensitivity to sensory stimuli, occurs with epidural anesthesia during labor. Assessing the degree of sensory block is important both for clinical practice and for patient safety, yet the assessment procedure is not standardized. A variety of stimuli have been used, as well as a variety of endpoints for determining the level of sensory block. This lack of standardization causes not only a difference in the way independent clinicians determine sensory block, it can also result in inconsistent description of these levels for the same patient, as well as issues with replication of studies and implementation of clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric Anesthesia DigestSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207